Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Nonspecific RNA transcription assay

RNA polymerase RNA transcription

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 mej013

mej013

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 26 June 2013 - 01:55 PM

I'm optimizing a nonspecific RNA transcription assay to analyze purified RNA polymerase (RNAP). The assay involves incubating a sample with a reaction mix that contains unlabeled ATP, CTP, and GTP and P32 labeled UTP, stopping the reaction with 5% TCA, then loading the reaction onto glass filters, washing the filters, then measuring the radioactivity of each filters using a scintillation counter. I've optimized the protocol with commercial T7 RNAP and I'm able to get strong signal that is consistent between samples with equal amounts of RNAP. However, I'm now attempting to optimize the assay using E. coli cell lysate, but there is a huge variation between samples assaying the same volume of lysate. I'm not sure why there would be so much variation, since I don't see it with T7 RNAP. Has anyone used a similar nonspecific transcription assay and run into the same problem?

#2 bob1

bob1

    Thelymitra pulchella

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,830 posts
414
Excellent

Posted 27 June 2013 - 03:31 PM

Was the density of the cell lysate the same in each case (i.e. did you grow it to the same OD)? Are there potential inhibitors in the medium or secreted from the bacteria?

#3 mej013

mej013

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 28 June 2013 - 07:04 AM

I've been using the same lysate sample to optimize the assay, using 10 uL for each sample I want to run. The cells were around an OD of .9 when I harvested the cells.

I did a side by side comparison of lysate samples to which I added Rnase inhibitor and samples where I didn't, and there wasn't any difference in signal between them.

I've harvested fresh cells and resuspended them so that they're about twice as concentrated as before, I'll see if that makes a difference or not.

#4 mej013

mej013

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 02 July 2013 - 08:32 AM

I tried some assays with the new lysate samples, and in order to determine if the increase in signal above the background is due to transcription, I boiled three 10 uL samples and compared that signal to lysate which was not boiled. I also boiled a sample containing commercial T7 polymerase to compare to a sample which was not boiled. The boiled T7 sample did not have signal above background, and the T7 I did not boil had a strong signal like I've seen before. However the signal from boiled lysate was not different from my sample which was not boiled, so whatever is causing the increase in signal is not actually due to polymerase activity.

I think the next thing I'm going to try is playing with the concentration of my labeled and unlabeled UTP. I did this when opitimizing the T7, but for cell lysate the optimal concentrations may be different.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.