Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
- - - - -

Quant-iT assay development not returning correct values

Quant-iT DNA quantification

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Ian L

Ian L


  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 19 June 2013 - 10:02 AM

I am trying to implement the Quant-iT dsDNA high sensitivity assay in a 384 plate format. According to the manual, the normal set up is in a 1 mL assay volume, and involves diluting the dsDNA dye 1/200 in 500 uL before adding 500 uL of sample or standard. I have been diluting the dye 1/20, and mixing 15 uL of diluted dye with 10 uL of dsDNA standard or sample in each well. After some incubation time, I then use a plate reader to read the fluorescence values. I have been able to get a linear standard curve (0 to 100 ng); however, whenever I try to run a PCR product (adding 10 uL of diluted PCR product to 15 uL diluted dye), it does not give me the 'correct' value. I have been setting up all samples/standards in triplicate, and I also run water as a negative control.

I base the correct value on the number that the Qubit gives me, using the protocol as described in their manual. I am wondering if anyone else has tried to use a dye based DNA quantification assay in a small volume (~25 uL) format and if similar issues were encountered. In particular, my Quant-iT values are always lower than the Qubit values (the factor varies, but it differs as much as two fold).

Thanks for the help!

PS I am new here and also new to the field

#2 hobglobin


    Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional...

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,604 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 11:31 AM

First I thought the kit is only made for Qubit readers but it's not. But perhaps it's an inaccuracy of the plate reader? And another factor might be dNTPs in the PCR product which are either measured or not depending on method (not sure)?
Anyway I'd try out another fluorometer...

One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that did belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.

Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Quant-iT, DNA quantification

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.