Hi everyone,
I checked for expression of a (surface) protein in a cell line with flow cytometry and WB. According to flow cytometry (which is well established for this protein in my lab) 40% of the cells do express the protein. According to WB (which is also well established) there is no expression.
What could explain the discrepancy ? And which result would you trust ? Honestly, I'm at a loss, it's extremely strange...
Thanks...
Discrepancy between WB and Flow cytometry result
Started by Tabaluga, Apr 08 2013 02:52 AM
Flow cytometry Western Blot FACS WB
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 08 April 2013 - 02:52 AM
#2
Posted 08 April 2013 - 04:15 AM
I think its a matter of sensitivity, FCM is sensitive than western, as you say only 40% of cells express. Just to make sure, IP-down your protein and check whether it is a matter of visualization through straight western or expression.
I would prefer being perfectionist rather than a passionist in Research.
I always had an alternate hypothesis....
I always had an alternate hypothesis....
#3
Posted 08 April 2013 - 06:01 AM
Is the antibody that you're using monoclonal or polyclonal? If it is monoclonal, it could have a conformational epitope. A conformational epitope would be maintained in Flow but destroyed in WB.
#4
Posted 08 April 2013 - 06:50 AM
Are you using a live dead discriminator in your flow assay?
#5
Posted 08 April 2013 - 11:31 AM
Missle, on 08 April 2013 - 06:01 AM, said:
Is the antibody that you're using monoclonal or polyclonal? If it is monoclonal, it could have a conformational epitope. A conformational epitope would be maintained in Flow but destroyed in WB.
This was my thought as well. Not that uncommon for a monoclonal to work in an IP or FC but not on a WB.
#6
Posted 08 April 2013 - 01:03 PM
Thanks for your replies !
This was my thought as well. Not that uncommon for a monoclonal to work in an IP or FC but not on a WB.
But it can't be only with this particular cell line ? Both methods are well established for this type of cells / cell lines, the AB works fine in both WB and FACS. Just this one cell line making trouble.
By the way, I looked up old records, earlier there were no positive cells in either FACS or WB.
No, I gate out debris etc. but don't have PI or something similar. But then again I ask myself why suddenly this one cell line should have 40 % more dead cells ? They looked fine in culture, too.
That was my first thought too, but I think 40 % is quite an amount, and the MFI is not that low either. And now considering the old measurements I looked up, I don't think that explains it, as FACS was negative back then...
Vinegar, on 08 April 2013 - 11:31 AM, said:
Missle, on 08 April 2013 - 06:01 AM, said:
Is the antibody that you're using monoclonal or polyclonal? If it is monoclonal, it could have a conformational epitope. A conformational epitope would be maintained in Flow but destroyed in WB.
This was my thought as well. Not that uncommon for a monoclonal to work in an IP or FC but not on a WB.
But it can't be only with this particular cell line ? Both methods are well established for this type of cells / cell lines, the AB works fine in both WB and FACS. Just this one cell line making trouble.
By the way, I looked up old records, earlier there were no positive cells in either FACS or WB.
leelee, on 08 April 2013 - 06:50 AM, said:
Are you using a live dead discriminator in your flow assay?
No, I gate out debris etc. but don't have PI or something similar. But then again I ask myself why suddenly this one cell line should have 40 % more dead cells ? They looked fine in culture, too.
GNANA, on 08 April 2013 - 04:15 AM, said:
I think its a matter of sensitivity, FCM is sensitive than western, as you say only 40% of cells express.
That was my first thought too, but I think 40 % is quite an amount, and the MFI is not that low either. And now considering the old measurements I looked up, I don't think that explains it, as FACS was negative back then...















