My girlfriend asked me to help analyze her qPCR results, but I have a math background and not a biological sciences one.
I'm a bit confused about how to normalize her data. I've include a subset below. (I know the efficiency values are weird/impossible, but someone else in her lab ran the standard curves)
Efficiency Values --> Target = 2.088, Reference = 1.99
CT(target) CT(ref) Concentration (target) Pfaffl Ratio Normalized Concentration
24.84 23.85 47600 2.055 ?
25.5 23.85 32900 1.264 ?
23.22 21.07 124000 * 1 124000
23.27 20.94 120000 0.881 ?
26.67 21.68 17500 0.120 ?
Using the Pfaffl method, I chose the sample with the largest concentration(*) to use as the "Calibrator"
I then applied the Pfaffl method to each sample to get the ratios above.
Now my question is how do I get the normalized concentration values? I thought that you multiply the concentration of the calibrator by the ratio calculated in each row,
but it seems strange that the data is so much different than the measured values in the first 2 samples when I do that.
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 14 March 2013 - 11:24 PM
#2
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:44 AM
You don't get concentration. Relative quatification (delta-delta method, Pfaffl method,...) only gives you a ratio. That's all that you can get from the equation.
If you want concentrations, you need to have a standard curves in-run, with known concentration values and calculate it by a standard-curve method (or usually directly by software).
The fact that the software spits out some concentration values is not important, there is no way the software knows the exact concentration in the first place, so there are some dummy values, you can't normalize them.
Efficiency is maybe theoretically impossible, but relatively common to get, especially with small amplicons
If you want concentrations, you need to have a standard curves in-run, with known concentration values and calculate it by a standard-curve method (or usually directly by software).
The fact that the software spits out some concentration values is not important, there is no way the software knows the exact concentration in the first place, so there are some dummy values, you can't normalize them.
Efficiency is maybe theoretically impossible, but relatively common to get, especially with small amplicons
Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.
I never trust anything that can't be doubted.
I never trust anything that can't be doubted.
#3
Posted 20 March 2013 - 09:40 AM
https://docs.google....dit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google....dit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google....dit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google....dit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google....dit?usp=sharing
-----
Babak Memari
Babak Memari
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: qpcr, normalization, pfaffl
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Tissue and Cell Culture →
Housekeeper for HEK cells?Started by Guest_Stephp_* , 17 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
PCR, RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR →
FAM and VIC S-curvesStarted by Guest_squallweathered_* , 23 Apr 2013 |
|
|
|
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
siRNA, microRNA and RNAi →
miRNA quantificationStarted by Guest_dude3005_* , 18 Mar 2013 |
|
|
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Molecular Biology →
qPCR detectionStarted by Guest_wdk_* , 28 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Products and Vendors Discussion →
Lab Equipments →
How useful are Service Contracts for qPCR machines?Started by Guest_doxorubicin_* , 19 Feb 2013 |
|
|














