I'm trying to tag my gene, but I don't have good memories with FLAG since its antibody for purification (anti-FLAG M2) is very detergent sensitive. The manual says I can't use, Triton, Tween 20, CHAPS or digitonin, so its like I can't lyse my cells with any popular lysis buffer. I have never used His plasmids before, and I want to know if its purification antibodies are as sensitive as FLAG's? The other thing is that I want to use a purification column this time instead of beads/affinity gel, just to practice. SIGMA does not have any column for FLAG, but His columns are available everywhere. which one to buy?
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 30 January 2013 - 11:00 PM
#2
Posted 31 January 2013 - 02:15 PM
My protein purification colleague says to steer away from his and look at GST tags instead; he says they are much more soluble and more specific than his.
#3
Posted 31 January 2013 - 05:47 PM
thanks Bob
#4
Posted 04 February 2013 - 02:51 PM
I agree with bob1, GST tags are more specific and usually easier to purify in one step. They're also more soluble but sometimes have problems of their own. I've gotten His tagged proteins quite clean once you establish a good protocol, usually washing with gradients of imidazole. I didn't use his antibodies though, you can use nickel sepharose to purify and then wash slowly with an increasing amount of imadazole to get rid of the few non-specific proteins that show up before eluting.
#5
Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:58 PM
Yes, that's one of the advantages of His. You can purify without antibody, but FLAg definitely needs antibody M1. M2 or M5, and they seem to be detergent sensitive. I read an article that compared many tag systems and FLAG was the most expensive method.
I'm not sure what GST vector Bob's friend is using. Most of the vectors I have found so far are around 5 kb. Now, my gene of interest is around 6.6 kb and this will make a huge plasmid together. I'm not sure if His-tag is suitable for long fragments, or GST is more efficient for a 6.6 kb gene?
In addition, I want to tag the c-terminal, but most GST vectors are designed for n-terminal tagging.
I'm not sure what GST vector Bob's friend is using. Most of the vectors I have found so far are around 5 kb. Now, my gene of interest is around 6.6 kb and this will make a huge plasmid together. I'm not sure if His-tag is suitable for long fragments, or GST is more efficient for a 6.6 kb gene?
In addition, I want to tag the c-terminal, but most GST vectors are designed for n-terminal tagging.
#6
Posted 06 February 2013 - 04:43 PM
Do you have a chromatography system? you can use it with column to purify his-tagged protein using gradient / step-wise elution, and do another round of ion exchange to further purify your protein.
I can give you some of my contact of suppliers if you are still in Malaysia, just pm me.
I can give you some of my contact of suppliers if you are still in Malaysia, just pm me.
Expecting the world to treat you fairly because you are a good person is like expecting the lion not to attack you because you are a vegetarian.
..."best of our knowledge, as far as we know this had never been reported before, though I can't possible read all the published journals on earth, but by perform thorough search in google, the keywords did not match any documents"...
"what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger"---Goddess Casandra reminds me to be strong
"It's all just DNA. Do it."---phage434
..."best of our knowledge, as far as we know this had never been reported before, though I can't possible read all the published journals on earth, but by perform thorough search in google, the keywords did not match any documents"...
"what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger"---Goddess Casandra reminds me to be strong
"It's all just DNA. Do it."---phage434
#7
Posted 06 February 2013 - 08:22 PM
My friends also have some Invitrogen columns I can borrow. Thanks Adrian.















