Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Need help on STAT1-GFP nuclear translocation

STAT translocation IFN GFP

  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 Fresa-ni

Fresa-ni

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 25 January 2013 - 04:06 AM

Hello! Everyone,

(1) I am using a cell line expressing STAT1-eGFP to demonstrate the nuclear translocation of STAT1-eGFP after IFN-treatment.
My purpose is to compare the efficacy of IFNs with this system.
Briefly, HEK293 (or HELA) cells were transfected with a plasmid STAT1-eGFP. (The plasmid should be fine because it was bought from Addgene, and other published studies have used the same plasmid for the same nuclear translocation experiment.)
I have transitorily transfected cells, and I also have HEK293 stably expressing STAT1-eGFP.
STAT1-eGFP located in cytoplasm that is consistent with others’ researches.
Then I treated those cells with 1000U/ml IFNbeta or IFNalpha. However, I have not observed the accumulation of STAT1-eGFP in nuclear after 30min, 1hours, 2hours, 4hours, 8hours, and 12hours post-treatment.
IFNs should be fine. I have used them for IFN-receptor internalisation experiment. They worked very well.
I do not understand why there was no nuclear trafficking.

(2) I have also used immunofluorescence to detect the phosphorylation state of STAT1.
Firstly, HELA (HEK293, Raji and U973) was cultured on slide, then cultured in medium with 1% serum 24 hours before IFN-treatment. 1 hour before IFN treatment, cells were cultured in medium without serum.
After IFN-treatment, cells was washed, fixed and permeabilized (I have tried Paraformaldehyde 4% for fixation then 1% saponin; or cold methanol treated at -20C for 10min). After washing, rabbit anti-STAT1-p (T701) (from Cell signalling) was used as 1st antibody, then goat anti rabbit antibody-Alexa594 (I have used whole goat IgG and also its F(ab)’2; from Cell signalling) was used as 2nd antibody.
However, I did not detect any specific signalling of STAT1-p.

The last possibility that I will check is the serum for cell culture medium. My colleagues also have a bit problem with this serum when doing cytokine related experiment. However, I have starved cells before IFN-treatment. I am very confused.

Any suggestion and help is appreciated!
Thanks a lot!

#2 doxorubicin

doxorubicin

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts
15
Good

Posted 25 January 2013 - 07:03 AM

Based on what you've said, there is no obvious answer. Can you show some images?

#3 Fresa-ni

Fresa-ni

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 28 January 2013 - 01:31 AM

Thanks a lot!
The image is HEK293 cell (transitorily transfected with plasmid expressing STAT1-eGFP http://www.addgene.org/12301/) after IFN-treatment (1000U/ml). The location of STAT1-gfp is the same as before the treatment.
What I expect is something like this one
http://www.ncbi.nlm....2181/figure/f3/ ((A), 2nd image=Vector+ IFNbeta)

Attached Thumbnails

  • Sans titre.jpg

Edited by Fresa-ni, 28 January 2013 - 01:41 AM.


#4 Fresa-ni

Fresa-ni

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 28 January 2013 - 01:56 AM

In this image, Hela cell cultured on cover slide (starved by using DMEM + 1% serum 24 hours before treatment, and no serum DMEM 1 hour before treatment) was treated with 250mp IFNbeta for 25min, then washed, fixed with cold methanol for 7min at -20C; after washing, anti phospho-STAT1antibody (http://www.cellsigna...ducts/9167.html) was added. 2nd antibody was goat anti rabbit F(ab)'2-Alexa594 (also from Cellsignaling).
When taking this confocal picture, the voltage was quite high otherwise we can see nothing. Hence, the red color here is just autofluorescence.

Attached Thumbnails

  • Composite.jpg


#5 bob1

bob1

    Thelymitra pulchella

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,800 posts
407
Excellent

Posted 28 January 2013 - 12:35 PM

Is the phospho stat-1 stuff being done on the same GFP plasmid as the localization stuff?

If so - check the sequence of the plasmid to ensure that it has the correct Stat-1 sequence (mistakes can easily be made - you should do this for all plasmids entering the lab).

Could it be that your IFN is degraded in some manner, which would result in you not seeing the effect you expect?

#6 doxorubicin

doxorubicin

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts
15
Good

Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:11 AM

I agree that non-functional IFN could explain both results. Try with a fresh batch and do a western blot in parallel to be certain that the IFN is working. The phospho-Stat1 antibody you are using is absolutely amazing. I've used it for IF and flow cytometry ant the signal to noise is wonderful.

#7 Fresa-ni

Fresa-ni

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 January 2013 - 05:25 AM

The phospho-stat1 translocation experiment was done with non-transfected Hela cell.

IFN should be OK. I have tried fresh stock of IFN and both IFN alpha and beta. I have worked with the aliquot of same IFN in other experiment that worked well. Hence the quality of IFN should be fine.

Edited by Fresa-ni, 29 January 2013 - 05:26 AM.


#8 Fresa-ni

Fresa-ni

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 January 2013 - 05:53 AM

Hello! Doxorubicin,
I am not very experienced in intracellular staining.
To fix/permeabilize protein in nuclear, which method is better? Cold methanol at -20C for 10 min (I have red this method on several publications), or PFA 4%+ saponin 0.5% (this is rather for cytoplasmic protein)?
Which cell did you use for your IF experiment of phospho-stat1? I have use Hela and Hek293. I think that the 2 cell lines should have typical Jak/stat(1) signaling pathway.
Is WB more sensitive than IF? I find IF is pretty tricky.

#9 doxorubicin

doxorubicin

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts
15
Good

Posted 29 January 2013 - 06:31 AM

IF should be pretty straightforward and sensitive. I always do 10 minutes of 3.7% PFA at 37C followed by at least 30 minutes of -20C methanol (100%). This should be fairly similar to the standard Cell Signaling Technology protocol they recommend on their website. Find their protocol and follow it carefully.

WB is not necessarily more sensitive than IF...it's just the only raw data that anyone presents these days, so it is easy to look at and tell just what is working/not working....but if your lab doesn't do western blots, then it's likely too much trouble.

HeLa and 293 cells should respond well to IFN. 293 cells, depending on the line, will often jump off the slide during PBS washes, so are sometimes not ideal for imaging. I use WISH cells, which are similar to HeLa (or identical if you believe ATCC).

#10 Fresa-ni

Fresa-ni

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 January 2013 - 06:56 AM

Should I starve the cells before IFN treatment in WB experiment? In publication it was not mentioned, hence I guess that it is not necessary. On the contrary, to stave the cells before IFN treatment seems necessary in IF experiment. Am I right?

#11 doxorubicin

doxorubicin

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts
15
Good

Posted 29 January 2013 - 07:56 AM

You will see an impressive change in Stat1 phosphorylation after IFN treatment independent of starvation. IF and western will agree if your reagents are working correctly. Personally, I don't starve.

#12 Fresa-ni

Fresa-ni

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 January 2013 - 08:41 AM

Typical IF protocol suggests 10min of cold methanol permeabilization. Have you tried 10min instead of 30min of methanol permeabilization? Would 10min be insuffisant?
When there is almost no IFN in serum, starving would not be necessary. But if there is a relative high concentration of IFN in serum, it could be problematic. Recently the quality of the serum in my lab is not so sure...

#13 doxorubicin

doxorubicin

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts
15
Good

Posted 31 January 2013 - 01:23 AM

Looks like you are correct. Ten minutes of -20C methanol is what they recommend now: http://www.cellsigna...F_methanol.html

Good point about potentially having some IFN in the serum. I use heat inactivated serum and we test every new lot of serum prior to purchase, so maybe that's why this isn't a problem for our lab. Based on your images, high basal signaling isn't your problem, though.

#14 Fresa-ni

Fresa-ni

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 31 January 2013 - 01:50 AM

I find a website which has a lot of info http://www.copewithc...pe.cgi?key=WISH
According to this site, WISH is used to assay IFN alpha and gamma. So it seems that WISH is more sensitive to IFN than its original clone, HELA cell.
I found some WISH cells and hope I would get some good news...

#15 willc

willc

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 03 February 2014 - 02:50 AM

I know this topic has gone cold but i was curious to find out whether Fresna-ni had managed to show translocation of Stat-1 by using the EGFP tagged plasmid from Addgene. I have tried the same approach IFN treating three different cell lines and i couldn't find any translocation taking place using a live cell confocal. I haven't sequenced the plasmid yet but I am curious to know if there is a problem with it..







Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.