#1
Posted 01 January 2013  04:25 AM
#2
Posted 08 January 2013  06:44 PM
for % of viability I calculate it as abs of test divide by abs of control (no treatment) X100
(get average of Abs for test repeats in ur exp / by average abs of repeats of control)
Each experiment should be repeated 23 times at different days or more, so I would calculate STD from my these repeats ( if I do the experiment 3 times) I would calculate % of vaibility for each time as previously mentioned then calculate standard deviation or Standard error for these 3 times,
the i guess X axis would be log conc, and Y axis would be % of viability..
This I would do if I were u
#3
Posted 05 March 2013  05:47 PM
I would also appreciate some help with this. I do MTS assays to measure the activity of certain compounds. I do each trial with 4 replicates for each group and then normalize the abs of each well with the average abs of the control. After that I calculate the average and standard deviation for each group. I then repeated the experiment 2 more times for a total of three trials, but now I end up with three averages (each having a standard deviation) and I can't figure out the proper way to calculate the final average and standard deviation. I have tried various search terms in google and could not find anything that match exactly with what I need.
For example, the data that I got for drug A at a certain concentration is (data are % of control): Trial 1: mean = 90 , SD= 5; Trial 2: mean = 94, SD = 4; Trial 3: mean = 89, SD = 3. How do I calculate the overall mean and standard deviation of these values?
I was told that I can just propagate the errors of each trial. Is this OK to do?
It would be a lot easier if I could just average the abs for each treatment group, normalize to the control and calculate the average and SD of the three trials, but what happens to the error associated with the abs of the replicated wells?
Would greatly appreciate a response if anyone has any experience with this type of calculation.
Thanks!
#4
Posted 06 March 2013  02:04 PM
I do each trial with 4 replicates for each group and then normalize the abs of each well with the average abs of the control. After that I calculate the average and standard deviation for each group. I then repeated the experiment 2 more times for a total of three trials, but now I end up with three averages (each having a standard deviation) and I can't figure out the proper way to calculate the final average and standard deviation.
Arrange the data into an ANOVA table this will separate the error into withintrial and betweentrial components (many text books use the term blocks to represent the different trials you performed).
Chances are that there will be no significant difference between the trials and you will be able to treat them as a single average and standard deviation as you suggested but it never hurts to check.
#5
Posted 06 March 2013  10:30 PM
Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
% well 1 % well 1 % well 1
% well 2 % well 2 % well 2
% well 3 % well 3 % well 3
% well 4 % well 4 % well 4
If there are no significant differences, then I can just use all the values to calculate one average and standard deviation?
Edited by Ms VV, 06 March 2013  10:35 PM.
#6
Posted 07 March 2013  09:54 AM
good luck
#7
Posted 08 March 2013  03:01 AM
Hello,
I would also appreciate some help with this. I do MTS assays to measure the activity of certain compounds. I do each trial with 4 replicates for each group and then normalize the abs of each well with the average abs of the control. After that I calculate the average and standard deviation for each group. I then repeated the experiment 2 more times for a total of three trials, but now I end up with three averages (each having a standard deviation) and I can't figure out the proper way to calculate the final average and standard deviation. I have tried various search terms in google and could not find anything that match exactly with what I need.
For example, the data that I got for drug A at a certain concentration is (data are % of control): Trial 1: mean = 90 , SD= 5; Trial 2: mean = 94, SD = 4; Trial 3: mean = 89, SD = 3. How do I calculate the overall mean and standard deviation of these values?
I was told that I can just propagate the errors of each trial. Is this OK to do?
It would be a lot easier if I could just average the abs for each treatment group, normalize to the control and calculate the average and SD of the three trials, but what happens to the error associated with the abs of the replicated wells?
Would greatly appreciate a response if anyone has any experience with this type of calculation.
Thanks!
Hi Ms W,
Just a quick question. When you do your MTS assay do you use 96wells plates. If yes, do you change the media everyday. I find out that in 72hrs the media only wells are almost empty. I would love any tips as this is my first time with this type of experiment. Thanks
#8
Posted 09 March 2013  12:01 AM
Hi Peniel! Yes, I use 96 well plates. I usually incubate for 48 h without replacing the medium and have no noticeable decrease in volume by looking at the wells. There is a decrease of 0.10.2 mL when measured. I incubated a few times for 72 h and also did not noticed a big decrease in volume. I use 0.1 mL per well. The wells could hold up to 0.3 mL, maybe you could use a higher volume if you are not already doing so. Sorry, I don't really have any suggestions other since I haven't had that issue.
#9
Posted 10 March 2013  10:57 AM
Hi Ms W,
Just a quick question. When you do your MTS assay do you use 96wells plates. If yes, do you change the media everyday. I find out that in 72hrs the media only wells are almost empty. I would love any tips as this is my first time with this type of experiment. Thanks
A problem with the humidity levels in the incubator?
Are all your media controls in a row along one side? Be wary of always running your experiments in the same direction across a plate. In theory it shouldn't make a difference and all wells are identical but there is always the potential for biasing the results.
#10
Posted 10 March 2013  01:34 PM
A problem with the humidity levels in the incubator?
Are all your media controls in a row along one side? Be wary of always running your experiments in the same direction across a plate. In theory it shouldn't make a difference and all wells are identical but there is always the potential for biasing the results.
and keep in mind the "edge effect" (higher evaporation at the edges of well plates)
Il dort. Quoique le sort fût pour lui bien étrange,
Il vivait. Il mourut quand il n'eut plus son ange;
La chose simplement d'ellemême arriva,
Comme la nuit se fait lorsque le jour s'en va.
#11
Posted 12 March 2013  12:29 AM
Hi Ms W,
Just a quick question. When you do your MTS assay do you use 96wells plates. If yes, do you change the media everyday. I find out that in 72hrs the media only wells are almost empty. I would love any tips as this is my first time with this type of experiment. Thanks
A problem with the humidity levels in the incubator?
Are all your media controls in a row along one side? Be wary of always running your experiments in the same direction across a plate. In theory it shouldn't make a difference and all wells are identical but there is always the potential for biasing the results.
I don't know if the humidity level is a problem. Yeah I run my experiment in a column (B2G2) for a drug concentration and B3G3..... The media is usually just to fill up the empty wells.
Do you think having the wells low on media could affect my result? I assumed the plate reader only take A1(ddH20) into consideration whilst generating absorbances.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: data, plot, graph, MTT

The Next Phase of Science  Paper Writing and Publishing →
Journal Discussion  How to Get Papers Published →
The problem with science publishing. "Accelerating Scientific Publication byStarted by methylnick, 07 Aug 2015 publication, data, impact factor and 2 more... 


Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Tissue and Cell Culture →
MTT assay readingStarted by Mustafa84, 26 Nov 2014 MCF7, MTT, Cell line and 1 more... 


Protocols and Techniques Forums →
General Lab Techniques →
Interpretation on absorbance reading from 96 well MTT assayStarted by Frazermb, 23 Oct 2013 MTT, 96 well, absorbance, assay 


Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Immunology →
MTT assay trouble shootingStarted by Gunalan, 02 Apr 2013 Mtt 


Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Cell Biology →
MTT, Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assay →
Large variations in MTTStarted by hanazawayien, 18 Jan 2013 MTT 
