Is overexpression a correct way to check shRNA knockdown efficiency?
Started by gyma, Dec 27 2012 03:37 AM
overexpression shRNA western blot
9 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 27 December 2012 - 03:37 AM
Hi I have a strange problem here. I got two shRNA sets targeting two different genes, each with 5 shRNAs. After I confirmed the sequence, I overexpressed 0.5 ug of vectors that express these two genes and 1 ug of each shRNA in 293FT. Unexpectedly, none of the 10 shRNA worked. I didn't see even a slight knockdown by western blot. This is so wierd because some of these shRNAs have been validated by the company. Am I using the wrong way or is it simply that all 10 shRNAs were ineffective? Thank you in advance.
happy holidays.
happy holidays.
#2
Posted 27 December 2012 - 06:43 AM
I don't think you can overexpress a gene and check its knockdown efficiency by its shRNAs because the exogenous expressed genes can give you very high level of expression which may mask any effect exerted by the shRNAs. You can just check endogenous gene expression without using an overexpressing vector.
#3
Posted 27 December 2012 - 11:35 AM
I agree, using overexpression vectors will not show you the result you want, especially if the vectors have viral promoters. At best you would need to use vectors with native human/mouse or similar promoters.
#4
Posted 28 December 2012 - 04:31 AM
Thank you guys. But the problem is endogenous expression of these genes in 293 or other adherent cell lines are very low. Thats why I used overexpression. And these vectors dont have a fluorescent marker so I cant sort the positive cells out. Do you guys have any advice on this point? Thank you.
#5
Posted 28 December 2012 - 06:39 PM
Have you looked at the transcript and seen if there is KD?
#6
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:12 PM
bob1, on 28 December 2012 - 06:39 PM, said:
Have you looked at the transcript and seen if there is KD?
You mean if RNA level is detectable in eg 293 cells, I can still check it in 293?
#7
Posted 28 December 2012 - 11:40 PM
Yes, I was meaning checking the KD using endogenous levels in the 293s.
#9
Posted 04 January 2013 - 11:44 PM
bob1, on 28 December 2012 - 11:40 PM, said:
Yes, I was meaning checking the KD using endogenous levels in the 293s.
Shall I proceed with only less than 50% KD? Is there any methods to improve the KD? Can I expect some different result in cell lines like T-cells other than adherent cells?
#10
Posted 05 January 2013 - 02:55 PM
The only ways to improve would be to try different amounts of siRNA and/or some different siRNAs against the same gene(s).
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: overexpression, shRNA, western blot
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting →
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Neuroscience →
Lysis buffer for white matterStarted by Guest_Hilary57_* , 13 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting →
What is different between Native protein and Denatured protein samples.Started by Guest_Tai_* , 08 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
siRNA, microRNA and RNAi →
shRNA Lentiviral Transduction- loss of knockdown after 1-3 passagesStarted by Guest_Tensix_* , 30 Apr 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Neuroscience →
Western Blotting of Amyloid BetaStarted by Guest_Waqar Ahmad_* , 25 Apr 2013 |
|
|















