Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
- - - - -

HIV gene- PCR

Molecular biology PCR HIV Protease Non-specific band DMSO

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Paridhy



  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 01:25 AM

Hi all,

I have been trying to amplify the HIV gene from HIV infected patients' genomic DNA. I am not getting the respective band, instead I'm getting a non-specific band with all the samples.Posted Image I checked the template DNA with other genes, its working fine. I checked the primers by using them with PNL4-3 as template, I got the exact band length. I tried changing the cycling conditions, template quantity, MgCl2 conc., tried adding DMSO (2%), everything possible, still no use.. What else can I try doing so that I get the required amplification..??Posted Image

Suggestions would be greatly appreciated...

Thank you in advance.. Posted Image Posted Image

#2 Ameya P

Ameya P

    Rervm Cognoscere Cavsas

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 342 posts

Posted 06 December 2012 - 02:03 AM

Hi Paridhy,

Welcome to BioForum.

It would be great if you could post some information.

1. Gel picture of your unspecific bands that you are getting.
2. How are you extracting gDNA from patient samples ( Often blood proteins (contaminants) do not let your PCR work. Hence the non specific amplification. Am guessing here that your positive control template is purified with a protocol different from the one you are using for extracting gDNA.

NEW!!!! Would you donate your poop for a loved one? on CoffeeTableScience!!!! 

Image copyright: Adrian Koh SF.
Replication of this art is strictly prohibited without express permission of the artist

#3 Paridhy



  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 09 December 2012 - 10:26 PM

Hi Ameya,

The control I used was a vector that was readily available. I used QIAmp DNA isolation kit (mini) to isolate the gDNA. So, I think, the quality of the DNA would be fine.Posted Image I have also attached the gel pic (1st well: 100bp ladder; 2nd well: The PCR product, shows the nonspecific product; 3rd well: The positive control, HIVpNL4-3; 4th well: The negative control).

Thanks.. Posted Image

Attached Thumbnails

  • Admin 2012-12-06 14hr 06min.jpg

#4 Trof


    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,357 posts

Posted 10 December 2012 - 12:38 PM

If you used plasmid as a control (and next time I would probably use much less of it, 100 or even 1000x dilution, plasmid DNA has high copy number) it's not a complex template so it won't show nonspecific binding to other targets in human genome. At this picture the primers show very high dimer formation so I wouldn'd consider them very good. If everything fails you may try to redesign them.

Do you have a negative human sample to compare? It's also possible that the "nonspecific" band is actually specific and only different length than plasmid control. (I assume negative control is just water).

Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.