I will be looking at virus replication by real-time PCR using primers for antigenomic RNA. I originally wanted to do this with a FAM probe for increased sensitivity, but I am having much better luck with SYBR green.
I am unfamiliar with what is acceptable for measuring virus replication. If I was to present my data measuring replication by RT-PCR with SYBR green, would reviewers question why I did not use a more sensitive technique (i.e. FAM probe)?
I am hoping both are OK, but I was just wondering if anybody has published similar data using SYBR green with no problems.
Thanks,
Jared
1 reply to this topic
#1
Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:24 PM
#2
Posted 13 November 2012 - 03:33 PM
Both types of methods are AFAIK accepted equally for quatitative real-time PCR, the probe increases the specificity, but with SYBR you can (and you should) do always a melting analysis after run to chcek wheter you have the right product.
I think SYBR with melting curve will be OK.
I think SYBR with melting curve will be OK.
Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.
I never trust anything that can't be doubted.
I never trust anything that can't be doubted.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: RT-PCR
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
PCR, RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR →
Primer Efficiency across runsStarted by Guest_Joe101_* , 08 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
siRNA, microRNA and RNAi →
Detecting miRNA mimics by RT-PCR?Started by Guest_SD1_* , 02 May 2013 |
|
|
|
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Molecular Biology →
qPCR detectionStarted by Guest_wdk_* , 28 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
PCR, RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR →
Why RNase H treatment after cDNA synthesisStarted by Guest_cellthetruth_* , 26 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Molecular Biology →
Best way to isolate viral mRNA for RT-PCR?Started by Guest_ACN_* , 25 Feb 2013 |
|
|















