Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Cell numbers versus confluency


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

Poll: Equal cell numbers or equal confluency? (4 member(s) have cast votes)

Which situation is preferable?

  1. Equal Cell Numbers (3 votes [75.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 75.00%

  2. Equal Plate Confluency (1 votes [25.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 knuf

knuf

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 104 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 23 October 2012 - 08:13 AM

Hi all! I have a question for you. I am looking at relative uptake of a compound between two cell types (microglia and astrocytes). Ideally, an equal number of cells would be treated at equal confluency, however astrocytes are quite a bit bigger than microglia. Therefore, if each plate is seeded with one million cells of either microglia or astrocytes, the astrocyte plate is going to appear much more confluent than the microglial plate. Likewise, an 80% confluent plate will have many more microglia than astrocytes.

Which situation would you consider preferable? Equal confluency (ie, both treated at 80% confluency) or equal number of cells (ie, 1 million cells treated regardless of confluency)?
Thanks!

#2 Artemis2007

Artemis2007

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 23 October 2012 - 09:25 AM

Could you plate the astrocytes in a larger plate, so that both cell number and confluence would be the same? Then you could adjust the volume of your treatment to account for the greater plate volume.

Another way would be to keep confluence the same and normalize for cell number at the end, i.e., express uptake in the form of umoles/million cells or something like that.

#3 leelee

leelee

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 652 posts
52
Excellent

Posted 23 October 2012 - 05:59 PM

Personally, I'd go for identical cell number. It is the only objective measure. You could get 10 people to look at a plate of cells and they would not all necessarily agree that it is 80% confluent, so I think this is a very poor measure.

If you are worried that the state of confluence the cells have reached will have an effect on compound uptake, you could try examining uptake for each cell line at different densities to work out if this is going to be a problem.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.