Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Multiplex PCR

multiplex PCR amplification sex determination

  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#1 Mad researcher

Mad researcher

    Researcher in making

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 105 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 17 October 2012 - 07:07 AM

I am running a multiplex PCR with sDY (sex determining primer) and 18s (control) primer to determine the sex of juvenile rainbow trout.

I am using 1.25 uL of PCR buffer (sigma), 250 micro molar of dNTP, 0.25 uL of Jump start Taq DNA and 0.4 microl molar of (sDY primer both F and R) and 0.1 micro molar of 18s Primer (both F and R). i take 40 ng of DNA and its a 12.5 uL reaction.

The problem i am facing is that i should get a single band around 400 bp if it is a female and double bands around 200-210 bp if it is a male. But now i am getting a faint (lighter) band which shouldn't appear in case of the female.

PCR CYCLE:

Initial denaturation at 94 degrees for 1 minute, denaturation for 60 sec at 94°C; 35 amplification cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec; and a final extension of 3 min at 72°C

--------------------------------------------------------------

What should i change so as to avoid the double band in case of female? I have already considered reducing the amount of DNA (to 30 ng).
Cheers,

Mad Researcher

#2 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,199 posts
109
Excellent

Posted 17 October 2012 - 07:21 AM

Please explain the structure of the sDY assay, what does it amplify? And what is the DNA difference between male and female in that region.

Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon


#3 Mad researcher

Mad researcher

    Researcher in making

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 105 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 17 October 2012 - 07:46 AM

The sdY gene encodes a putative protein of 192 amino acids that displays sequence homology with the car-boxy-terminal domain of interferon regulatory factor 9.
sdY gene was a male-specific genomic DNA sequence in the rainbow trout.
sDY is a master sex determine gene.
Cheers,

Mad Researcher

#4 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,199 posts
109
Excellent

Posted 17 October 2012 - 07:54 AM

Yeah but where are primers located? Where are the homologies? On the edges? Otherwise I still don't get how it could make longer sequence in females that lack this gene, and shorter in males. It's not ARMS assay or anything, so I need to see the whole schematic of the homologous regions and primer positions. There is no way how to understand what should be amplified without that.

Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon


#5 Mad researcher

Mad researcher

    Researcher in making

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 105 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 17 October 2012 - 08:06 AM

i messaged you a pciture of the sDY region. That is all they have mentioned. They have focoused more on In-situ hybridization.
Cheers,

Mad Researcher

#6 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,199 posts
109
Excellent

Posted 17 October 2012 - 10:03 AM

You should have posted it here in the thread, others might be interested too..

Anyway so you don't have a sequence of your primers and you don't know where they are? How do you want to opltimise that?

The gel image at the top of your picture shows somethign different than you wrote, there is one bigger band of 18S control in both males and females, and one smaller only in males, amplifing sDY. So, primers must be specific for sDY only.
So you are getting those "male" bands in female samples?

There could be contamination (what about your negative control?) /cross-contamination or nonspecificity, but if you don't know sequence of the primers you can't find out where else they could bind. And if you do know the sequence, then you could blast them to the trout sequence and find out where they bind in the first place.
Generaly increasing the annealing can help if it's nonspecifity.

Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon


#7 Mad researcher

Mad researcher

    Researcher in making

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 105 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 17 October 2012 - 10:22 AM

Sorry about that, i couldn't find the option here.

I have the primer sequence but i don't know where they are.

Yes, what you say about the gel image is correct. I was mistaken. As i said, the bands appear in males but also in female (faint). There is no genomic sequence available for the trout yet.

I have increased the annealing temp to 61 (the primer melting temp is 62.8 for sDY and 62.2 for 18s) but it didn't help. I am planning to lower the temp to 58 or 59 to see if it helps.
Cheers,

Mad Researcher

#8 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,199 posts
109
Excellent

Posted 17 October 2012 - 12:35 PM

Thiose faint bands, were there from the beginning or they started to appear later? Is your negative control negative (no faint bands)?

Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon


#9 Mad researcher

Mad researcher

    Researcher in making

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 105 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 17 October 2012 - 12:49 PM

they were present in every multiplex i ran. I don't have a negative control but i have a positive control and they appear in the poistive control as well (the faint bands)
Cheers,

Mad Researcher

#10 hobglobin

hobglobin

    Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional...

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,525 posts
97
Excellent

Posted 17 October 2012 - 12:55 PM

also in adult trout DNA?
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.

#11 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,199 posts
109
Excellent

Posted 17 October 2012 - 12:58 PM

OK, rule one. Always run negative control.
Put there just primers and reaction mix and water and see if you get faint bands there.

Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon


#12 Mad researcher

Mad researcher

    Researcher in making

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 105 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 17 October 2012 - 01:07 PM

also in adult trout DNA?


I don't deal with adult trout DNA, i am only interested in juvenile trout. Though, the paper i referred used adult trout and they didn't have problem like me.
Cheers,

Mad Researcher

#13 Mad researcher

Mad researcher

    Researcher in making

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 105 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 17 October 2012 - 01:08 PM

OK, rule one. Always run negative control.
Put there just primers and reaction mix and water and see if you get faint bands there.


Ok i will run negative control tomorrow and if i face the same problem we can discuss it then.

Thanks a lot Trof.
Cheers,

Mad Researcher

#14 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,199 posts
109
Excellent

Posted 17 October 2012 - 02:15 PM

By the way, the trout Y chromosome sequence is in GenBank EU081756.1 mRNA for your gene is AB626896.1
Your primers position on Y chromosome sequence are 11381 - 114033 for forward and 11701 - 11723 for reverse. The exact product length should be 343 bp and they don't seem to bind to other trout regions (though with incomplete genome this may not mean much, however there are lots of trout sequences available).

All these you could get from your paper and Blast.

Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon


#15 Mad researcher

Mad researcher

    Researcher in making

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 105 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 17 October 2012 - 02:56 PM

i knew the trout Y chromosome sequence is available, i was saying the whole genome sequence of the trout is not available.
Cheers,

Mad Researcher





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.