Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Hygiene hypothesis challenged


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Phil Geis

Phil Geis

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 101 posts
8
Neutral

Posted 14 October 2012 - 05:03 PM

The Hygiene Hypothesis and its implications for home hygiene, lifestyle and public health


authors challenge validity of hygiene hypothesis as commonly considered

http://www.ifh-homeh...a2?OpenDocument

Edited by Phil Geis, 14 October 2012 - 05:04 PM.


#2 bob1

bob1

    Thelymitra pulchella

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,340 posts
222
Excellent

Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:57 PM

Huh, I didn't think this was anything new.  I am sure I heard about that hypothesis more than 5 years ago.

There is also the addition to this hypothesis that loss of intestinal parasites such as the pinworms (treated for in western world) play a role in this rise in allergic type responses.  The hypothesis  doesn't suggest why different allergic syndromes are more common in different parts of the world though.

#3 Phil Geis

Phil Geis

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 101 posts
8
Neutral

Posted 15 October 2012 - 05:06 PM

Thr hypothesis is about 20 years old.  This paper challenges the validity of the hypothesis.

#4 bob1

bob1

    Thelymitra pulchella

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,340 posts
222
Excellent

Posted 15 October 2012 - 07:02 PM

I was meaning that the challenge to the hygiene hypothesis isn't new to me, though I didn't put it very well in my other post.  I do also have to say that this challenge is just a variant of the hygiene hypothesis in my opinion, much like the intestinal parasite theory I mentioned in my other post.

#5 El Crazy Xabi

El Crazy Xabi

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 86 posts
6
Neutral

Posted 15 October 2012 - 08:13 PM

It's more a formal update of the original hypothesis formulation than something really new
http://www.news-medi...hypothesis.aspx

#6 Phil Geis

Phil Geis

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 101 posts
8
Neutral

Posted 16 October 2012 - 04:34 AM

Thanks bob - I see.  I think most microbiologists considered the hypothesis weak but few published in opposition.  The support was largely from the medical community supported by alot of poor-designed studies that usually looked at asthma levels in fram kids vs. city kids.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.