Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Best ratio of 5 Plasmids for Lentivirus production


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Ambinlab

Ambinlab

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 65 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 05 September 2012 - 03:17 PM

Dear All,

I am planning to produce lentivirus. I have cloned my gene on 14Kb lentiviral plasmid. Now I need to package with 4 other plasmids (VSVG, TAT, REV, GAG).

What is the best ratio for these plasmids to transfect into 293Ts? I read somewhere that I need to use 20:1:1:1:2 ratio (Plasmid with the gene: tat: rev:gag:vsvg) Has anybody use this ration before?

Also, I am going to use PEI to transfect 293Ts. Does anybody have any experience using PEI for lentiviral production? I usually use the ratio 1:3 (ug DNA: ul PEI). Will it work for lentiviruses?

Thanks all

#2 zodiac1505

zodiac1505

    Enthusiast

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 92 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 18 October 2012 - 06:19 AM

We used to make lentivirus with 293 cells in 15 cm plates. The mix was 20 micro gram plasmid+3 micro gram VsVg+ 3 micro gram rev+ 4 micro gram gag pol+ 5 micro gram pAdvantage with 70 micro liter of Fugene HD (transfection reagent) and we used to let it stand for 30 minutes before pipetting onto the cells. We had tried several transfection reagents and Fugene seemed to give us the best transfection. The media was changed the next day and the sups were collected at 48 and 72 hours and spun down to get the viral particles.

#3 Ambinlab

Ambinlab

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 65 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 18 October 2012 - 10:27 AM

Zodiac,
thanks for your reply. I used TransIt (1:3 ratio 3 being TransIt). It seems to give good transfection efficiency (~70% of cells expressing GFP) I used 3:1:1:1:1 (3 being backbone) for a 10 cm dish. I also filter it using 0.45 um filter. Is it possible that the virus get stuck in the filter?

#4 zodiac1505

zodiac1505

    Enthusiast

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 92 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 18 October 2012 - 11:31 AM

We used the same filter. I don't think there is any chance that the virus would get stuck in the filter.

Though you might have a good transfection, the problem might be with the production and release of viral particles. You might want to try using new batches of the viral components. I remember one time, our production was getting really low and we had to try all different combinations and finally it worked once we got a new vial of one of the components (don't remember which) from another lab.

#5 Ambinlab

Ambinlab

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 65 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 16 February 2013 - 10:57 PM

OK, here I am again with my lenti problems :(
I have the virus working. Well, with TransIt and the ratio of 5:1:1:1:1. I usually get 60% green cells one day after transfection. When I use 1ml of the sup to infect 293T cells in a 12 well dish, I usually get 10-20 green cells. I guess the titre is too low?!
Now it gets even worse! When I ultracentrifuge the sup (~30 ml after three collections) and use the concentrated virus to infect, I donot get anything green after 24h??!!!
This is very strange for me, I have tried two different speeds for ultracentrifugation. Nothing! I tried not to filter th esup prior to ultracentrifugation. Nothing!
This is giving me bad headache these days. The only thing I can think of, is because GFP is under UBC promoter, it is getting expressed so weak that I cant see under normal conditions. Or as zodiac said, something is wrong with my helper plasmids...
Any ideas? Please help me.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.