Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

- - - - -

power and fragment length: how correlated are they?

ChIP DNA fragment sonication Foaming

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 SStamis

SStamis

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 31 August 2012 - 11:56 AM

I'm running ChIP based off of a protocol in Nature Protocols "Fanelli et al, Vol 6. No. 12, 2011. p. 1905-1919" for ChIP of FFPE tissues.  I've worked with ChIP before on cell culture, and found that I got horrible foaming unless I did many, many rounds of 10 sec pulses, 20% duty for infinity (probably more like 5 reps but it felt like infinity).  This protocol combines MNase and sonication by doing Low power sonication, MNase, then high power sonication.
Well I get bad foaming on high power.  I have a Branson 450 sonifier and I'm using a tapered 1/8" tip (though I have a stepped tip as well), 250µl volume in 1.5ml tube, and I can use a max output of 3 without foaming.  So what is the advantage of high power sonication?  Are the fragment lengths more consistant?  Does it favor a larger or smaller fragment size (ie 100bp vs 1,000bp)?  Is it just faster?
Like everyone else in the world, sonicating is the bane of my work life.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: ChIP, DNA fragment, sonication, Foaming

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.