Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Appropriate statistics to apply- Fishers exact test?


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 SRae

SRae

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 July 2012 - 07:02 PM

Hi.

I was hoping someone would be able to help me where my supervisors can't!
I'm writing up my M.Sc. dissertation and really stuck on the appropriate statistical analysis to use with my results. My study involved the use of intestinal biopsies from 11 Crohn's disease patients and 4 control patients. I was using PCR to test for the presence of a specific mycobacteria within these biopsies. From my results, I found this mycobacteria in 7 out of 11 of my Crohn's disease biopsies and 0 out of 4 of the control patients. What is the appropriate statistical test to apply to find if this is significant? My research tells me to use the fishers exact test, however, i'm concerned my small sample number just isn't enough to apply this kind of statistical analysis to. I would much appreciate it if someone could advise me!

#2 admin

admin

    member

  • Super Administrators
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 July 2012 - 07:20 PM

To me, Fisher's exact test is appropriate because it is good for contingency tables with small numbers.

#3 SRae

SRae

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 July 2012 - 07:23 PM

Hi! Thank you for replying! I'm just concerned that my sample size is so small, that I can't really apply any statistical analysis to the study at all?! Particularly because I have such a small number of controls.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.