Non-specific binding in ELISA assays
#1
Posted 23 September 2003 - 10:14 AM
#2
Posted 07 October 2003 - 04:48 AM
#3
Posted 24 October 2003 - 10:51 AM
bethk, on Sep 23 2003, 10:14 AM, said:
All the traditional blocking methods are good since if you work at a optimum concentration of these reagents. To eliminate the background you could increase the concentration of the BSA (up to 5%) or Tween-20 (up to 3-5%). For sandwich ELISA you could try the blocking buffer with 5% of sucrose, 1% BSA and 0.01% of sodium azide. It work well for me...
Calf serum, casein, powder milk, and other can be used also to block the plates...
Try to increase the time with the blocking solution.
On the other hand, the background could be related with the specificity of your coating (is it a monoclonal or policlonal antibody? Which concentration?)
#4
Posted 31 October 2003 - 06:30 AM
By the way,Tween-20 maynot have any bad effects on your test,and avoid adding sodium azide in your buffer if you use HRP labelled antibody.
#5
Posted 11 December 2003 - 06:52 PM
Currently I am using 1% BSA, 0.05% Tween 20 and EDTA. I have even tried 1% FBS v/v - decreased background by a mere 0.3.
I have difficulty establishing the dynamic range now. Could it be due to the polyclonal antibody? My blank can read 0.8 while the lesser serial dilutions could register negative readings.
Any comments/suggestions/recommendations?
Thanks!
#6
Posted 06 August 2004 - 07:19 AM
#7
Posted 06 January 2005 - 05:59 PM
my captrure is monoclonal--blocking with TBS-Tween 20--sample(serum)--primary Ab(polysera-not purified)--detection Ab conjugated to HRP. except the coationg all reactions are at RT.
what i am trying to understand is the efficiency of tween-20 in blocking a well with hydrophilic and hydrophobic sites [maxisorp plates]
Edited by amkush, 06 January 2005 - 06:02 PM.
#8
Posted 09 October 2009 - 11:15 AM
mpanchal, on Aug 6 2004, 08:19 AM, said:
Hi, I'm intrigued by your post. We are blocking in BSA and having issues with our ELISA. Why shouldn't you use BSA and why is casein better?
Thanks!
#9
Posted 10 October 2009 - 04:50 AM
beth, on Oct 9 2009, 09:15 PM, said:
mpanchal, on Aug 6 2004, 08:19 AM, said:
Hi, I'm intrigued by your post. We are blocking in BSA and having issues with our ELISA. Why shouldn't you use BSA and why is casein better?
Thanks!
We routinely use BSA blocking for immunometric assays.
Our lab runs routine tumor marker immunoassays (PSA, CA125, CEA, thyroglobulin etc) in the clinical laboratory setting. We run thousands of human sera a year in accredited assays generated "in house".
Plates are coated with primary antibody, washed in tris/NaCl buffer + 0.05% tween and blocked overnight in 0.1 % BSA/sorbitol. This is followed by aspiration, air drying and vacuum packing. All steps are done on a plate coating robot.
Our assay buffers contain 0.1% BSA, 0.05 % tween and heat-aggregated irrelevant mouse immunoglobulin (to minimize assay interference from heterophilic antibodies).
We have NEVER had a problem blocking assays for human serum proteins with BSA.
Hope this helps
#10
Posted 07 July 2010 - 05:23 PM
We routinely use BSA blocking for immunometric assays.
Our lab runs routine tumor marker immunoassays (PSA, CA125, CEA, thyroglobulin etc) in the clinical laboratory setting. We run thousands of human sera a year in accredited assays generated "in house".
Plates are coated with primary antibody, washed in tris/NaCl buffer + 0.05% tween and blocked overnight in 0.1 % BSA/sorbitol. This is followed by aspiration, air drying and vacuum packing. All steps are done on a plate coating robot.
Our assay buffers contain 0.1% BSA, 0.05 % tween and heat-aggregated irrelevant mouse immunoglobulin (to minimize assay interference from heterophilic antibodies).
We have NEVER had a problem blocking assays for human serum proteins with BSA.
Hope this helps
[/quote]
#11
Posted 23 March 2011 - 07:42 AM
The best thing to do when developing a new ELISA is to screen 5 to 10 different blocking formulations such as BSA, milk, serum, casein or some of the proprietary commercial formulations and you can try supplementing with detergent such as NP-40 (Igepal) or Tween 20. Avoid azide-containing solutions if you are developing with peroxidase conjugated detection antibodies.
If you are getting high background with human serum samples, calculate your theoretical antigen concentration in the sample and ask yourself if the quantity you are applying to your plate is reasonable. That is, you should generally only require ng/ml quantities for specific detection. I recommend doing checkerboard titrations of your capture, detection and sample in separate experiments to identify conditions that yield specific detection.
#12
Posted 23 March 2011 - 06:04 PM
#13
Posted 19 July 2011 - 12:48 PM
Why should I eclude tween? And is there anything I can do to reduce the backgound but still have the affinity?
#14
Posted 30 October 2011 - 12:23 PM
If it possible and analyte doesnt show revere hook effect you may dilute it.
Also sometimes removing of high abundant proteins from samples before ELISA helps.




This topic is locked









