Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

smearing below band of interest


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 jamestoon1

jamestoon1

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 35 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 30 June 2012 - 09:59 PM

i am doing touchdown pcr with the following condition:

98'C 30 sec initial denaturation

10 cycles:
98'C 5 sec denaturation
60'C 5 sec annealing
72'C 5 sec extension

25 cycles:
98'C 5 sec denaturation
59'C 5 sec annealing
72'C 5 sec extension

72'C 2 min final extension

my band of interest is 200bp
i got the band
but there are smearing below the band:
Attached File  untitled.bmp   468.18KB   1340 downloads

what has gone wrong and how should i rectify the problem?

FYI, my pcr master mix contain 18.5ul master mix, 0.5 ul forward primer, 0.5 ul reverse primer, 0.5 ul DNA.

#2 phage434

phage434

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,747 posts
304
Excellent

Posted 01 July 2012 - 04:07 AM

Given the 98 denature, I assume you are using Phusion. Phusion master mixes are usually 2x master mixes. You should double check to make sure you are not missing the added water.

#3 leelee

leelee

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 652 posts
53
Excellent

Posted 01 July 2012 - 06:23 AM

How much of your PCR volume did you load on the gel? It looks very overloaded to me. The smearing below your product could be primer dimer.

Just out of interest, can I ask what the rationale for using those cycle conditions is? It seems odd to me to have two annealing temperatures that are SO close.

Edited by leelee, 01 July 2012 - 06:24 AM.


#4 jamestoon1

jamestoon1

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 35 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 02 July 2012 - 03:10 AM

Given the 98 denature, I assume you are using Phusion. Phusion master mixes are usually 2x master mixes. You should double check to make sure you are not missing the added water.


Yes, it's Phusion. It was a typographical error. What I used was 10ul master mix plus 8.5ul water.

#5 jamestoon1

jamestoon1

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 35 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 02 July 2012 - 03:14 AM

How much of your PCR volume did you load on the gel? It looks very overloaded to me. The smearing below your product could be primer dimer.

Just out of interest, can I ask what the rationale for using those cycle conditions is? It seems odd to me to have two annealing temperatures that are SO close.

I loaded 3ul.
60'C is the highest achievable temp. I mean, after 60'C, i can no longer get any pcr product. so i chose to use tat one as the starting temperature.
and i chose 59'C because from my optimization experiments, 59'C can result in multiple bands, so i would not go below that temp.
there should be no problem with primer design. i have BLASTed and have checked with a few softwares. Moreover this is the primer pair obtained from literature. A lot of people have used this primer pair.

#6 leelee

leelee

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 652 posts
53
Excellent

Posted 03 July 2012 - 08:20 PM

If you get a product at 60C, why are you bothering with different temperatures?

Given that you are loading 3ul of a 20ul reaction and getting that much DNA in your lanes, I think that you are using too much template and that is what you are seeing on your gel. There is a huge amount of DNA up near the well too.

My advice is to do a dilution series of your template (say a 1/10, 1/100, 1/1000 and 1/10000) then run the PCR again.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.