Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

Did my EcoRI restriction digestion work? picture included!

ecori restriction digestion

  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

#31 Fluffy

Fluffy

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 76 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 24 August 2012 - 06:06 PM

Sorry one more thing, I am also working on another gene at the same time. I follow the exact same steps as the other gene I asked my questions about. For the second gene I recently ligated it into the TOPO vector as well. I analyzed a few colonies after transformation for positive clones. I attached a picture of my colony PCR showing positive transformants, my insert size is 585bp. Based on that, it seems the picture indicates that all my transformants are positive.
08.21.2012 TOPO Colony PCR UB2 48FB.jpg

Like the other gene I needed to double digest the TOPO vector+insert using NdeI and XhoI enzymes to later ligate into pET14b vector that is double digested with NdeI and XhoI enzymes as well.

I attached a photo of my TOPO vector+ insert double digest which shows a weird banding pattern, what could the reason be for this unwanted banding pattern?
08.24.2012 TOPO+48FB UB2 insert NdeI and XhoI digestion.jpg

Thanks for all your help Posted Image

Edited by Fluffy, 24 August 2012 - 06:07 PM.


#32 Papaver

Papaver

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 77 posts
19
Good

Posted 26 August 2012 - 10:09 PM

I think that you have to digest more template to make sure you cann see your 600 bp fragment in the gel. Also the staining is not good. You can barely see the ladder, especially the small sizes.
I don't know the expected sizes and the shown one, but what could also have happened is that your digestion was not complete. It seems a little bit that only one enzyme has cut (which I cannot exactly say because of missing sizes).Also showing the undigested vector might help.
Just give it another try. You can check with another enzymes (e.g. EcoRI) at the same time to make sure your construct is ok. It once happened to me that the fragement was double ligated into the vector...

#33 Fluffy

Fluffy

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 76 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 27 August 2012 - 07:29 AM

Hi Papaver,

Thanks for your reply. I will take into consideration your ideas. But do you think there is a problem with my double digestion protocol listed below

TOPO+insert 1 (concentration 44.2ng/uL)
Plasmid DNA 3ug (67.9uL)
10X buffer H 3uL
NdeI 1uL
XhoI 3uL
NO WATER ADDED

TOPO+insert 2 (concentration 43.3ng/uL)
Plasmid DNA 3ug (69.3uL)
10X buffer H 3uL
NdeI 1uL
XhoI 1uL
NO WATER ADDED

#34 almost a doctor

almost a doctor

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 244 posts
15
Good

Posted 27 August 2012 - 08:10 AM

Why are you adding only 3ul of 10x buffer? Posted Image According to your recipe, the final concentration of your restriction buffer is 0.4x which is a 60% lower than it should be, so yes there is a problem with your reactions, as your buffering conditions will not be the optimal for the enzymes.

You need to dilute your 10x buffer to a final 1x buffer concentration, not just add 3µl per reaction (I don't understand where the 3ul come from). If you need to add that much volume of DNA, you can prepare the reactions in a final volume of 100ul, add 10ul of buffer, keep your DNA and enzyme volumes as they are, and then top up with water.

Just my 2 cents.

on the other hand, if there's an actual reason to have the buffer at 0.4x concentration just ignore my message Posted Image

Edited by almost a doctor, 27 August 2012 - 08:13 AM.


#35 Fluffy

Fluffy

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 76 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 27 August 2012 - 11:21 AM

Your 2 cents are worthy to me..hehe..

No, the 0.4x is not part of the reaction conditions. I think that is a dumb mistake by me. I am suppose to follow the general reaction conditions for restriction digestion which agrees with your suggestion.

I will definately give that protocol a try and hope for the best.

Thanks, you guys are awesome!

#36 phage434

phage434

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,451 posts
245
Excellent

Posted 27 August 2012 - 03:18 PM

You should be adding water to your restriction digest. I'd recommend this reaction setup:

5 ul of a 10x buffer (use the right one, probably buffer 4 if you use NEB enzymes)
0.5 ul 100x BSA
1 ul each enzyme
1 ug of DNA (less than 15 ul total volume)
sufficient water to bring the volume to 50 ul (more than 27 ul)

This does several things:
1) correct final buffer concentration (1x)
2) dilutes impurities in your DNA prep that can cause problems (primarily ethanol and Gu-HCl)
3) reduces the concentration of glycerol in the reaction (REs are in 50% glycerol, and you need to keep the final concentration below 5%)

Your reaction will be mostly done in 30 minutes of incubation at 37, and if you choose your enzymes, you can heat kill it at 80 for 20 minutes and use it directly in a ligation. It's easiest to do this in a PCR cycler.

It is a mistake to try to maintain a high concentration of DNA in these reactions. You don't need it for ligation, and trying to do it leads to many problems. Load 20 ul of the cut product on a gel, use 2 ul in a ligation, and keep the rest in the freezer if you want.

#37 Fluffy

Fluffy

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 76 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 28 August 2012 - 06:48 AM

Hey Phage 434,

Wow, thanks to you too, I will be honest with you a lot of the points you mentioned in your post I am not familiar with. It really helps to know these key points you mentioned for future lab work. I will also try your method and hope for the best result that are satisfying.

I really hope this forum keeps going, it is great help to beginners like me.

#38 Fluffy

Fluffy

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 76 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 28 August 2012 - 06:23 PM

Hello All,

Almost a doctor, I would have tried your method as well but realized I did not have enough plasmid mini prep left Posted Image. I went ahead and tried only Phage434's latest suggested protocol. Unfortuantely, the digestion failed again. Here is a picture of how the digestion banding pattern is 08.28.2012 TOPO+UB2 insert NdeI and XhoI digest.jpg

I forgot to run an undigested TOPO+insert on the same gel, and ended up running it by itself on a separate gel. Here is the image of the undigested TOPO+insert undigested TOPO.jpg
The image is not very clear, sorry.

Based on the image, I would assume that my samples did not get digested. I thought my enzymes are the problem, but one of my colleagues in the lab recently used the enzymes and their digestion was successfull.

I am confused as to what my problem is :(

Thanks again to all

#39 Papaver

Papaver

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 77 posts
19
Good

Posted 28 August 2012 - 10:22 PM

So, I would say there is no insert.

Which clone(s) have you checked by digestion? Based on your PCR-Gel, I would have chosen samples 6 and 12.
One question considering your PCR...have you run a negative control? All bands besides lane 6 and 12 seem to me like they could be false positive.

Have you tried another enzyme just for checking your constructs? Are you sure that neither NdeI or XhoI cut in your insert?

#40 phage434

phage434

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,451 posts
245
Excellent

Posted 29 August 2012 - 07:09 AM

I agree with Papaver. Try cutting with another enzyme, one that cuts your vector backbone. The bands look uncut. Are you expecting the NdeI and XhoI sites to be present in the original vector, or are they on your insert? It might be time for sequencing if you can't figure out what is happening. Dead enzyme would also explain this, so check that you can cut something else (or show that the DNA can be cut with a different enzyme).

#41 Fluffy

Fluffy

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 76 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 29 August 2012 - 04:03 PM

Good day to all,

In response to Papaver, the clones I chose are 7, 8, 9 , and 10. I actually avoided 6 and 12 because they were too bright at first, but today I decided to include them in my EcoRI digestion that cuts at the vector around the insert. What do you mean by negative control please?

In response to Phage 434, NdeI and XhoI are meant to cut at my insert.

Today, I did as you two wished I used another enzyme and the results seem a bit more promising.
Here is an image, 08.29.2012 TOPO+UB2 insert EcoRI digestion edit.jpg
Sorry the image is not that clear.
The first two bands on the left hand side, particularly the second one from left seem to have the correct construct of interest at size 585bp.

So should I preform NdeI and XhoI digestion on these two and see the result?
Thanks!!

#42 Papaver

Papaver

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 77 posts
19
Good

Posted 29 August 2012 - 10:14 PM

Hi Fluffy,

negative control means you are adding water instead of template to the reaction. If a PCR band occurs you know that there is a condamination. And, often those bands are not that bright as the real positive ones...

So, if you are doing a EcoRI digestion with some other clones, wait for the result and then chose the clone that has the right size, either one of the Eco-digestion or No. two of the picture you have posted here.

#43 phage434

phage434

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,451 posts
245
Excellent

Posted 30 August 2012 - 04:50 AM

I'd recommend you read the NdeI FAQ. Note what it says about DNA contaminants, and also the comment on long digestiosn. It is a good practice to get into the habit of reading these FAQs when using a new enzyme. Or to use a protocol that never requires you to use new enzymes.
http://www.neb.com/n...tR0111.asp#2089

#44 Fluffy

Fluffy

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 76 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 30 August 2012 - 03:26 PM

Thanks Papaver and Phage 434, these are good points to keep in mind. I will consider them as I continue my work :). I will keep you updated!

#45 Fluffy

Fluffy

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 76 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 31 August 2012 - 11:37 AM

Hi I am back Posted Image

I digested one of my clones with NdeI and XhoI and YAY!! it worked..I cut the band for the purpose of gene clean, and here is a picture of my insert after digeston and gene clean 08.31.2012 UB2 insert after digestion and gene clean.jpg

Now my next step is ligation. The concentration of my insert is low after gene clean 1.5-2ng/uL. I am worried it won't be sufficient for ligation.
My double digested pET14b vector is 23.3ng/uL.

Should I redigest my insert or is this concentration good enough for ligation?

Papaver I am not sure if you recall, we agreed on a ligation protocol for my other insert on this same thread and it worked well. Do you think I should use it again for this one, even though my insert concentration is lower.

Any ideas would help!!

Edited by Fluffy, 31 August 2012 - 11:40 AM.






Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.