I would like to amplify DNA using T7 DNA polymerase, using a primer which has a T7 promoter sequence in front of it.
This means the primer will anneal to the template, but the promoter sequence will not.
Does anyone have any idea if this will work? In other words; does T7 DNA polymerase need double stranded promoter sequence?
Please advise!
T7 on single stranded promoter sequence?
Started by hbn, May 10 2012 07:26 AM
T7 DNA polymerase amplification
11 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 10 May 2012 - 07:26 AM
#2
Posted 12 May 2012 - 12:25 PM
Summary: yes it needs double stranded. Simply PCR your DNA first using a hi-fi polymerase with your T7/Sp6 primers to get double stranded product with the promoter site there. (Convenient way of getting both sense and anti-sense probes for ISH)
Please see source for confirmation:
http://www.invitroge...nscription.html
Please see source for confirmation:
http://www.invitroge...nscription.html
#3
Posted 12 May 2012 - 12:37 PM
blin100,
Thanks for your reply! I thought of that too, but unfortunately, PCR is really difficult in this region, so I'm afraid that will not work...
But thanks for your help anyway!
Thanks for your reply! I thought of that too, but unfortunately, PCR is really difficult in this region, so I'm afraid that will not work...
But thanks for your help anyway!
#4
Posted 12 May 2012 - 12:44 PM
that is most unfortunate. Is it a repeat heavy region? Those are the worst 
If you can deal with a bit of extra RNA at the end, you could topo clone it into PCR2.1, the default topo plasmid which has a T7 site downstream of the A insertion point.
http://tools.invitro...2_1topo_map.pdf
If you can deal with a bit of extra RNA at the end, you could topo clone it into PCR2.1, the default topo plasmid which has a T7 site downstream of the A insertion point.
http://tools.invitro...2_1topo_map.pdf
#5
Posted 12 May 2012 - 12:51 PM
Jup, highly repetitive
It's almost impossible to make PCR primers...
But I'm starting from total genomic DNA and I want to perform target enrichment, so I somehow have to select for the region of interest... I guess it's impossible
But I'm starting from total genomic DNA and I want to perform target enrichment, so I somehow have to select for the region of interest... I guess it's impossible
#6
Posted 12 May 2012 - 01:17 PM
Ah, that is terrible. is this for ISH?
#7
Posted 12 May 2012 - 01:19 PM
No for next-gen sequencing...
#8
Posted 12 May 2012 - 01:23 PM
ahh, makes more sense. ISH has been on my mind recently and I saw T7 
I'm just thinking out loud here, but what if you made biotinylated complimentary oligos to the repeats, conjugate them to biotin beads or resin to basically make a selection column? Run your sheared dna through it, wash and elute?
I'm just thinking out loud here, but what if you made biotinylated complimentary oligos to the repeats, conjugate them to biotin beads or resin to basically make a selection column? Run your sheared dna through it, wash and elute?
#9
Posted 12 May 2012 - 01:27 PM
I guess you are doing ISH?
It's quite a repetitive genome (plants are difficult to work with
) so making specific probes may also be a challenge.
But still it's not that bad of an idea... Do you have any idea how long the probes and the sheared fragments have to be?
It's quite a repetitive genome (plants are difficult to work with
But still it's not that bad of an idea... Do you have any idea how long the probes and the sheared fragments have to be?
#10
Posted 12 May 2012 - 01:40 PM
Yea, I wish I were doing ISH...that worked 
Aha plants
unfortunately, I have absolutely no idea hahaha, just an idea that popped into my head. I would assume its possible since people do poly-A selection columns, you should be able to just substitute your oligo for the oligodT in those columns. I would guess they wouldn't be that long? maybe 20 bp?
Aha plants
#11
Posted 12 May 2012 - 01:50 PM
Haha, so you are TRYING to do ISH?
But not on plants, I assume?
Yes, plants are sometimes terrible to work with... I read some papers that this region was highly repetitive but it's worse than I expected! :|
Yes, a lot of target-enrichment kits work this way; with a probe and than 'fishing' out the probe-bound DNA sequences...
Yes, plants are sometimes terrible to work with... I read some papers that this region was highly repetitive but it's worse than I expected! :|
Yes, a lot of target-enrichment kits work this way; with a probe and than 'fishing' out the probe-bound DNA sequences...
#12
Posted 12 May 2012 - 02:25 PM
I'm doing ISH on adult mouse olfactory epithelium, its a wonderful system but RNA is super sticky there, so basically you get background regardless of how you wash 
Are there any benefits to working on plants?
I'm feeling like c elegans is the best model to work with, if only they had humanoid organs....
Is next gen sequencing of this super necessary for your work? It seems do-able but just barely
Are there any benefits to working on plants?
I'm feeling like c elegans is the best model to work with, if only they had humanoid organs....
Is next gen sequencing of this super necessary for your work? It seems do-able but just barely
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: T7, DNA polymerase, amplification
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Molecular Biology →
Multiplex PCRStarted by Guest_Mad researcher_* , 17 Oct 2012 |
|
|
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
ChIP and Next Generation Sequencing →
Small cell number ChIP-seq protocols - has anyone tried them?Started by Guest_angelawu_* , 03 Apr 2012 |
|
|
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
PCR, RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR →
|
|
|













