Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

- - - - -

LightCycler 480 Melting Curve Assay


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 fgentry

fgentry

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:57 AM

We are using a multiplex (targeting 3 genes) LightCycler 2.0 assay for the identification of Campylobacter and discrimination of C. jejuni from C. coli, that we have converted  to the LightCycler 480 since our lab does not have a LightCycler 2.0.  We thought we had fully optimized the assay to the LC 480 considering our controls worked very well, however, there seems never to be any consistency from one run to another using the same controls.  For example, one day our melting peaks look very sharp, next day jagged, next day dull instead of sharp, back to sharp,, etc.  More than anything else, I believe this is a probe issue, which are using from TIB MOLBIOL (LC probes).  However, I do not know the exact reason as to why the probes would behave in such a way.  We have followed the exact handling and storage of the probes as recommended by the supplier.  Any feedback or advice?

#2 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 950 posts
67
Excellent

Posted 03 May 2012 - 01:04 AM

Jagged curves..do you use repeatedly the same plate (unused wells) by a chance?
One other idea, do you mix all the probes for storage (or are they mixed) or you add them separately? Sometimes there can be sequence-based interactions with the primers and probes, so either adding them separately to the reaction premix or denaturing the mixture before pipeting can in this case.
Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.