Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Trouble Western Blotting a 360kDa Protein

western blotting large proteins

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 yosoytueres

yosoytueres

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 09 April 2012 - 08:08 AM

Hello,

I have been trying for weeks to western blot a 360kDa membrane protein. I've followed suggestions from online posts but I haven't been successful.

I have prepared 3 different lysates (Thermo Scientific M-per and Mem-Per kits and one using RIPA buffer) using three different cell lines (Two of which should have this protein of interest).

I am currently using a 4-15% gradient gel, I load about 60 ug of my samples, run the gel at 150V for 2.5 hrs, transfer onto nitrocellulose membrane over night in tris-glycine based buffer with 0.05% SDS and 20% methanol overnight at 30V and then for 1 more hr at 70V. (I've also tried other transfer times and voltages as well as transfer buffer with only 0.037% SDS)

Staining of my membrane after transfer with Ponceau stain does not show bands at the expected location but I have also stained my gel once after transfer and no bands are present at the expected location either.

Can anyone please offer any suggestions?? I am at a dead end.

#2 doxorubicin

doxorubicin

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts
15
Good

Posted 09 April 2012 - 11:23 AM

Sounds like you're doing everything just fine. I used to do Westerns for DNAPK (450kDa), and I would just run a 7 or 8% gel and then transfer a bit longer and reduce methanol to 10%.

#3 alex2815

alex2815

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 18 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 09 April 2012 - 01:59 PM

Were you using Criterion TGX 4-15% precast gel from Bio-rad? If this is the case, the gel will only separate proteins range from 20-250 kD optimally. As mentioned by doxorubicin, reducing methanol to 10% is good to try.

#4 PhDinAcronyms

PhDinAcronyms

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 37 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 09 April 2012 - 05:47 PM

Try running a tris acetate gel which resolves really large proteins well

#5 bob1

bob1

    Thelymitra pulchella

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,603 posts
385
Excellent

Posted 10 April 2012 - 02:23 PM

Ponceau may not be sensitive enough to detect a band in the desired location - try probing with an antibody.

#6 mhr

mhr

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 9 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 24 May 2012 - 12:31 PM

This may be a stupid suggestion- but if you are using nitrocellulose you may want to check your pore size. I know that the nitroceullose commonly used at our institution is pore size 0.45um, which allows proteins over about 110kDa to blow through during transfer (in my experience). Try a 0.2um pore size, or PVDF (I personally have much better results with PVDF for larger proteins).





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.