I would like to ask, whether it is necessary to precipitate the RNA (or even using phenol:chloroform extraction) after treatment with DNase , or I can directly use the DNase treated mixture for cDNA synthesis (as some manufacturers, e.g. Fermentas) recommend? I guess, by precipitation, I won't get rid of inactivated enzyme anyway, and by precipitating, I will only eliminate salts and divalent cations. My experience with using cDNA reverse transcribed from precipitated RNA was, that after PCR on the cDNA and gel electrophoresis, I got a strong band (or rather signal) sitting in the gel socket (non-migrating) - please see the picture. I also amplified the fragment of my interest, but I have no idea what is this non-migrating "thing" - I just worry that it could be the DNA bound to something that doesn't migrate, and possibly preventing the amplification. I would like to have the good RNA for subsequent qRT-PCR applications and find a compromise between the RNA quality and number of steps necessary, because each step introduces some kind of bias
One more question - if you want to test the efficiency of various cDNA reverse transcription kits, is the only way to test it by qRT-PCR?
Many thanks in advance!













