Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

SOS: new real time PCR machine needed.... which one?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 bassethoundt

bassethoundt

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 21 February 2012 - 06:16 AM

For our lab we think about a purchase of a new real time PCR Machine. After gathering some information about what the market of real time PCR machines offers, we’re not really sure what PCR machine might be the best choice for us. Basically we want to improve our progresses in our projects and get better and faster results of our researches.
I would highly appreciate if you can give me your opinion of your experiences with different real time PCRs in general, also in consideration of price/performance. That really would help us in our choice. Thanks!!!

#2 muntasir

muntasir

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 16 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:49 AM

I have used real time PCR from ABI, BioRad and Roche. Never think to invest on Roche. I am currently using ABI 7500 system. ABI has newly developed ViiA™ 7 System. With this you can perform diverse type of experiments. It allow multiplexing with 6 dyes at a time.

But if you ask about robustness of machines. I will only recommend bio rad cfx 96real. Its operation is so easys that you can allow any one to operate the machine for you. I think when it is about softwares all BioRad products are excellent.

If you are planing to do deal with lots of samples you should go with bioRad CFX96.

Hope it helps.

#3 Curtis

Curtis

    Metaller Scientist

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,113 posts
59
Excellent

Posted 22 February 2012 - 12:39 AM

Rotorgene Corbett

#4 bassethoundt

bassethoundt

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 22 February 2012 - 08:45 AM

Thanks a lot for the quick response and helpful advice. Yes, we think of 96-well plates. Easy to use software is certainly one of the decision criteria as well as data quality and reliability.
Why “never think to invest on Roche”?

#5 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,205 posts
110
Excellent

Posted 22 February 2012 - 12:51 PM

I can't compare that much, but we have Roche LightCycler 480 (96-well) and are quite happy with it. Sure it doesn't exactly kick ass in HRM, but that's because it's not air-heated. Worked with ABI machines before and don't remeber a reason why not to choose Roche. Old "coffee-makers" LighCyclers are widely used all over the world, they have a diagnostic-grade software and reliability.

Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon


#6 muntasir

muntasir

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 16 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:50 AM

We faced several problem with roche instruments. It required several servicing with respect to ABI or BioRad Real Time instruments. It was a trouble in our lab... :(




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.