Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Question about GFP


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 huyenpham

huyenpham

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 12 February 2012 - 11:43 PM

I cloned my interested gene by a 3FLAG-GFP tag vector. The cells were selected with puromycine, and the stable cell line were sorted one more time by FACS sorting to have GFP+ population cells. Now, after several months using the GFP+ cell line, I recognize that the GFP signal becomes weaker and weaker even though the WB still show the expression of my interested gene and GFP protein. The cells are resorted by FACS and the result is 3%. Only 3% of the assumed GFP+ cells is really positive. What is happening? Why the GFP becomes faded over time and so should I believe all the results I had with the assumed GFP+ cells that I had worked for more than 6 months?

#2 Flyingcell

Flyingcell

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 13 February 2012 - 12:15 AM

I think you should maintain the stable cell line in the media containing the puromycine so as to select the GFP positive cells always.

Mybe your interested proteins have some toxicity or negetive effect on the cell growth, so they cannot compete with the cells without GFP and your interested genes.

If you have the strict and logical control, your results are still available and useful and can be published in journals.

Good Luck!

#3 huyenpham

huyenpham

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 27 March 2012 - 03:22 AM

I always maintain my cells in medium containing puromycin. My main problem is that I cannot enrich my GFP positive cells. For example,the 1st time I did the FAC sorting I got 50% cells GFP positive. I grew the cells and 1 week later, the FAC sort gave 30% positve, and now after 4 time FAC sort I got 3% cell GFP positive. So where were all my GFP positive cells? I selected my cells in puromycin for more than 4 weeks to have the stable cell line and FACs afterwards. I cannot understand, my cells become resistant to puromycine but did not express GFP?

#4 donny

donny

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 74 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 29 March 2012 - 04:40 PM

It is common for protein expression to decrease with subculturing. As protein expression stresses the cells and reduces the cell growth rate, cells with spontaneous mutations that reduce protein expression will have a growth advantage and gradually dominate the population. For example, it has been shown that the amount of functional T7 RNA polymerases in BL21(DE3) strain decreases after multiple subculturing due to spontaneous mutation (http://www.microbial...m/content/4/1/3). This in turn reduces overexpression of the target protein from a pET vector. Even if it's not a pET system, mutations to the promoter that reduces overexpression will give the same effect. Since the antibiotic resistance gene is usually constitutively expressed and independent of the protein expression, your cells would still be resistant to puromycine but the protein expression ability is impaired.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.