Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Problems with detergents and Ni-NTA

detergent nickel GPCR

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 PaddyS

PaddyS

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 11 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 30 January 2012 - 11:36 PM

Hi all,

I am working on a GPCR which is expressed as an insoluble (not inclusion body) precipitate by cell-free protein synthesis.
My current work flow involves expression, resolubilisation, functional assays and/or purification. To date I have had no issues with resolubilisation (I get complete resolubilisation in <10m minutes at 30 degrees C with shaking).
I reolubilise into the detergent 14:0 lyso PG (LMPG) at 21mM (1%) link below. CMC is quite low, around 0.05mM
Unfortunately upon application to Ni-NTA I loose the majority (>90%) in the flow through. This is regardless of the pH (7.5 or 8) and so far regardless of the dilution of the detergent to 0.1mM by increasing the volume of the sample (eg: starting volume of 1mL made up to 200mL)

Ni-NTA binding buffer is 20mM NaPi pH7.5 or 8, 150mM NaCl, 5mM imidazole plus protein/detergent

What I do recover is a very small fraction and is unfortunately of no use to me at such small quantities.
Could someone please help me with any options that avoids complete denaturation.

http://avantilipids....atnumber=858120

Additional info: I wish to bind to Ni to perform detergent exchange with DDM

Cheers,

PaddyS

#2 mdfenko

mdfenko

    an elder

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,785 posts
132
Excellent

Posted 31 January 2012 - 09:36 AM

are you using enough ni-nta to bind the amount of protein you're loading?

is the ni-nta fresh or used and regenerated?
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do

#3 klinmed

klinmed

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 209 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 31 January 2012 - 11:58 AM

I have not come across the detergent you are using before (but it is obviously fairly non-denaturating). In this regard, are you sure that the tag is exposed in the partially denatured protein? To explore this possibility, maybe you could look at the effect of adding a denaturant (urea/guanidine) and see if this improves binding.

#4 PaddyS

PaddyS

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 11 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 01 February 2012 - 04:00 PM

Hi all,
Sorry for the delay.and thanks for the responses

@mdfenko The Ni-NTA, while not fresh has been only used once before and is regenerated.

@klinmed: I am worried also that the tag is not exposed enough to get good enough retention. But I wish to prevent and denaturation as I have shown previously that the receptors is somewhat folded and active and I may throw a spanner in the works by trying to do a refold.

Pat

#5 mdfenko

mdfenko

    an elder

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,785 posts
132
Excellent

Posted 02 February 2012 - 06:52 AM

you can try increasing the length of the his tag.
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do

#6 Bluefunk

Bluefunk

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 20 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 16 February 2012 - 08:03 PM

Have you tried a different detergent? Triton?. Im assuming you havent tried removing the detergent, or ifyou do the protein precipitates? Youre a fair way above the CMC soif you want to remove the detergent you'd have to do gel filtration as the micelles would be presumably larger than the dialysis MWCO





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.