Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

FACS antibody titration

which cells to use Fc blocker conjugation titration

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 sc_queen

sc_queen

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 34 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 09 January 2012 - 10:35 PM

Hi there,

I will be titrating my FACS antibodies (and this is my first time). Can anyone please answer some very basic questions below?

- Which cells should (or can) I use to titrate? (I will be sorting primary cells from normal tissue and/or normal epithelial cell line. Can I use ANY cells?)
- Is there any case where Fc-blocker is not required?
- Does the procedure somewhat vary depending on conjugation status (flourochrome, biotin, or non-conjugated), and if so, why?
- Do you recommend serial dilution or adding different amount of antibody to the same volume of buffer?

Thanks!

Edited by sc_queen, 09 January 2012 - 11:03 PM.


#2 science noob

science noob

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 275 posts
20
Excellent

Posted 10 January 2012 - 12:24 AM

Hi there,

I will be titrating my FACS antibodies (and this is my first time). Can anyone please answer some very basic questions below?

- Which cells should (or can) I use to titrate? (I will be sorting primary cells from normal tissue and/or normal epithelial cell line. Can I use ANY cells?)
- Is there any case where Fc-blocker is not required?
- Does the procedure somewhat vary depending on conjugation status (flourochrome, biotin, or non-conjugated), and if so, why?
- Do you recommend serial dilution or adding different amount of antibody to the same volume of buffer?

Thanks!


1. You can use any cell you want to do a titration but you have to ask yourself what are you optimising for. If you are detecting say, marker A on a specific cell line B, then the wise thing would be to use cell line B + antibody against marker A. However, this is only the case if you know cell line B expressed marker A (this can be done by literature search, gene expression experiments, immunostaining etc.). The flow antibody spec sheet usually comes with a 'positive control cell line' which will definitely express your marker of interest (it is usually immortalised cell lines or isolated mammalian cells).

2. Fc blocker is usually used on mouse/human serum analysis where you test for immune cell subpopulations. The rationale is that secondary antibodies could potentially bind to primary cells hence giving a false positive background. The main thing is to have a matched isotype control (this is the Ig of your primary antibody - again can be found in the spec sheet). It is advisable to use the same concentration as your primary and then use this as the 'background reference'.

3. If you're using the primary antibody for the first time, I would recommend you titrate the primary and secondary. Although most of the time, small changes to the secondary dilution doesn't affect the final data much (but who knows, don't risk it).

4. This is totally up to you. I normally just add the appropriate volume in the flow tube. E.g. 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 ul into 100ul cell suspension. I find this easier to handle if you have alot of tubes.

#3 Rsm

Rsm

    Post Dog

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 376 posts
8
Neutral

Posted 10 January 2012 - 12:29 AM

My 2 cents...

You should use cells (or a cell line) where only a subset of cells express your protein. This way you can distinguish positive events from negatives.

Fc blocker is required for Fc receptor positive cells, such as macrophages, lymphocytes, monocytes, so all lymphatic preparations and blood cells. If you there are no such cells in your tissue, you don't need to use Fc blocker.

Antibody titration should be done for any antibody, independent of conjugation.
I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

#4 sc_queen

sc_queen

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 34 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 11 January 2012 - 07:45 PM

Thanks Science noob and Rsm! It really helps.

#5 sc_queen

sc_queen

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 34 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 23 January 2012 - 08:31 AM

How do you analyze your data to determine the optimum concentration, by the way? If you could point me to a good website, that would be helpful, as well. My search has not been very successful... Thanks!

Edited by sc_queen, 23 January 2012 - 08:44 AM.


#6 keefec

keefec

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 20 February 2012 - 12:17 AM

How do you analyze your data to determine the optimum concentration, by the way? If you could point me to a good website, that would be helpful, as well. My search has not been very successful... Thanks!


I find it easiest to understand if you ask yourselfwhy are you even doing titrations in the first place. A few questions and answers I posted to myself which may help you answer that question:

1. To make sure your antibodies do not create a false positive - that is to say, negative cells should not appear stained due to overwhelming amounts of antibodies

2. To make sure your positives do not become a false negative - that is to say, all positive cells are all fully stained

3. To use less antibodies - if all your positive cells are fully stained, and increasing the concentration of the antibodies does not improve the percentage, you can save some antibodies

4. Good separation is a bonus - a positive peak, and a negative peak

There is actually a graph to guide you to find your optimal concentrations.. but I can't find it now. Vaguely, it looks like an X, and the optimal is somewhere near the middle of the X. The axis are probably X=antibody concentration, Y=signal intensity. With that in mind, hopefully you can determine your optimal concentrations.





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.