Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

- - - - -

RT-PCR inhibited after Turbo DNase treatment

Turbo DNase RT-PCR gDNA contamination RT-PCR inhibition

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 tilia25

tilia25

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 19 December 2011 - 01:25 AM

Hi all!

I used Turbo DNase (Ambion) to treat my RNA samples for gDNA contamination followed with heat deactivation (as in the protocol from manufacturer). The gDNA is removed but I encounter another problem.. After cDNA synthesis the PCR doesn't work! I checked up all possibilities (RNA degradation, cDNA synthesis fail, PCR products etc), everything leads to Turbo DNase buffer..
To test it, I used DNA template that works and prepare 3 samples for PCR:
1) mix of 0,5ul DNA with 0,5ul of the cDNA samples that does not give results,
2) I added aliquot of DNase buffer to my DNA sample;
3) positive control (just the DNA without any additives).
After standard PCR, only positive control gave good band; the mix between DNA and cDNA showed very faint band and last sample failed completely! Did anyone have similar problems?
I tried to purify my cDNA on a column, precipitate, add betaine, caseine, BSA, adjust Mg2+ concentration, dilute, add 1% Triton-X.. all for nothing.
Only 10x dilution and addition of 1% Triton gave me very faint band.. and in 2 cases (out of 40) precipitation restored template activity.
After column purification or precipitation my samples are clean (perfect spectra on NanoDrop) and of ca. 30 ng/ul concentration. Gels of RNA and cDNA look good too.

I am desperate.
Please help!

#2 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 946 posts
66
Excellent

Posted 21 December 2011 - 03:10 AM

Did you try phenol/chlorophorm extraction instead of column purification? Is your PCR enzyme somehow super sensitive to inhibition?
Anyway we use TURBO DNase-Free kit for a routine treatment of our RNA and we never had problems with inhibition.

Edited by Trof, 21 December 2011 - 03:10 AM.

Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

#3 tilia25

tilia25

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 22 December 2011 - 07:14 AM

I tried phenol/chlorophorm extraction and it didn't change anything..
I am not sure about the polymerase.. We've always used Taq polymerase from Invitrogen and never had problems before. Which one do you use?
Thanks a lot!

#4 WSN

WSN

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 39 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 06 January 2012 - 09:23 AM

If the DNase buffer is the sole problem, do your DNA digestion in your RT buffer, turboDnase works well in broad ion strenth and pH scale. Good luck.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Turbo DNase, RT-PCR, gDNA contamination, RT-PCR inhibition

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.