We are working with "pre-miRs" from Ambion and using flow cytometry to evaluate delivery eficiency. FAM labeled controls work fine when transfecting with lipofectamine. When using electroporation (e.g. for Jurkat cells or cord blood CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cells) we have to use the Cy3 labeled control (because FAM signal in the cytosol becomes undetectable by flow cytometry). The problem is that over 80% of the cells in the control tube without the shock (but with the Cy3 labeled control) becomes labeled. I found in another old topic, that the control pre-miR can bind to the cell membrane, resulting in a false positive (if you dont use the control to identify such problem). Is there anybody having the same trouble? How did you solved it ? We are using a high concentration (50 to 100nM) of the pre-miR (as this is the recomended). When using a FITC labeled siRNA, we can evaluate the eficiency without any problem. Could i use this to check my eficiency, during padronizations ? Thank you all in advance. Rodrigo.
Cy3 labeled control Pre-miR from Ambion binding to cell membrane.
Started by rapane, Nov 28 2011 08:58 AM
Cy3 Pre-miR Ambion electroporation
No replies to this topic
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Cy3, Pre-miR, Ambion, electroporation
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Molecular Cloning →
Problem with Transforming E. coli DH10BacStarted by Guest_IPI_* , 26 Mar 2012 |
|
|
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Molecular Biology →
How to prepare Gram(+) bacteria for electrotransformationStarted by Guest_joy123_* , 13 Feb 2012 |
|
|
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Molecular Cloning →
Trouble cloning E.coli cells with pUC18 and insertStarted by Guest_Biol74_* , 31 Jan 2012 |
|
|
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Microbiology →
Electroporation in Pseudomonas aeruginosaStarted by Guest_rameshcdri_* , 19 Dec 2011 |
|
|
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Cell Biology →
GFP non-fluorescent on tissueStarted by Guest_nastyferatu_* , 09 Sep 2011 |
|
|













