What is the general consensus of stat/graph software amongst scientists on Bioforum?
3
6 replies to this topic
#1
-
- Active Members
-
- 130 posts
Veteran
Posted 22 November 2011 - 04:50 AM
I have used Graphpad Prism (awesome + love the graph wizard function), Microsoft Excel (not very user friendly stat-wise) and currently learning to use IBM's SPSS (very technical).
What is the general consensus of stat/graph software amongst scientists on Bioforum?
What is the general consensus of stat/graph software amongst scientists on Bioforum?
#2
-
- Active Members
-
- 59 posts
Enthusiast
Posted 03 January 2012 - 10:51 PM
I use Graphpad and R language. I think excel is the worst program, as this paper tell us 
2002_McCullough.pdf (90.8K)
Number of downloads: 11
2002_McCullough.pdf (90.8K)
Number of downloads: 11
Chance favors the prepared mind
Louis Pasteur.
Louis Pasteur.
#4
-
- Active Members
-
- 4,282 posts
Guitar Hero
Posted 23 April 2012 - 10:19 AM
minitab for stats. basic stuff.
sigmaplot for graphics.
sigmaplot for graphics.
"When there's no more room in hell the dead will walk the Earth"
#5
-
- Moderator
-
- 815 posts
Epigenetist
Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:08 PM
I like Graphpad Prism, very handy and useful for biologists.
#6
-
- Active Members
-
- 65 posts
Enthusiast
Posted 23 April 2012 - 09:06 PM
Graphpad Prism is nice for ploting and graph
I use Microsoft Excel as data storage and simple calculation
SPSS is nice for stats analysis.
I use Microsoft Excel as data storage and simple calculation
SPSS is nice for stats analysis.
