What is the general consensus of stat/graph software amongst scientists on Bioforum?
0
6 replies to this topic
#1
science noob
-
- Active Members
-
- 225 posts
Veteran
12
Good
Good
Posted 22 November 2011 - 04:50 AM
I have used Graphpad Prism (awesome + love the graph wizard function), Microsoft Excel (not very user friendly stat-wise) and currently learning to use IBM's SPSS (very technical).
What is the general consensus of stat/graph software amongst scientists on Bioforum?
What is the general consensus of stat/graph software amongst scientists on Bioforum?
#2
Felipillo
-
- Active Members
-
- 53 posts
Enthusiast
4
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 03 January 2012 - 10:51 PM
I use Graphpad and R language. I think excel is the worst program, as this paper tell us 
2002_McCullough.pdf 90.8K
88 downloads
2002_McCullough.pdf 90.8K
88 downloads
Chance favors the prepared mind
Louis Pasteur.
Louis Pasteur.
#3
knuf
-
- Active Members
-
- 100 posts
Veteran
3
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 04 January 2012 - 07:29 AM
We use sigmaplot
#4
toejam
-
- Active Members
-
- 159 posts
Guitar Hero
14
Good
Good
Posted 23 April 2012 - 10:19 AM
minitab for stats. basic stuff.
sigmaplot for graphics.
sigmaplot for graphics.
"When there's no more room in hell the dead will walk the Earth"
#5
pcrman
-
- Global Moderators
-
- 1,047 posts
Epigenetist
49
Excellent
Excellent
Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:08 PM
I like Graphpad Prism, very handy and useful for biologists.
#6
newborn
-
- Active Members
-
- 65 posts
Enthusiast
2
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 23 April 2012 - 09:06 PM
Graphpad Prism is nice for ploting and graph
I use Microsoft Excel as data storage and simple calculation
SPSS is nice for stats analysis.
I use Microsoft Excel as data storage and simple calculation
SPSS is nice for stats analysis.
#7
leelee
-
- Active Members
-
- 644 posts
Veteran
51
Excellent
Excellent
Posted 23 April 2012 - 10:06 PM
I 
graphpad!!
graphpad!!
