Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Protein folding affected by neg. cahrges amino acids?


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Wek

Wek

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 46 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 21 November 2011 - 11:00 PM

How much does a neg. charge amino acid (aspartate) affect the protein folding? I'm curious as to whether 5 aa substitution (ser/thr -> asp) to mimic phosphorylation can affect the protein folding enough to render the
protein useless. By the way, these aa subs would be between aa 15-46 of a ~400 aa long protein and the
central DNA-binding core domain is not near these subs.

Btw, one will see a faster running band for the modified protein when compared to a wt protein, right?

Thanks

#2 deadally

deadally

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 28 November 2011 - 06:10 AM

1) There's no way to tell for sure how it will affect protein structure. It may do nothing or completely destroy everything. There are techniques available to evaluate that, though.

2) The difference in running would be so miniscule that you won't see any difference on SDS-PAGE. The switch to negative charge should also have no effect, since the SDS is supposed to make the charges of all proteins essentially uniform.

#3 doxorubicin

doxorubicin

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts
15
Good

Posted 28 November 2011 - 02:35 PM

Phosphorylation of Ser-Pro and Thr-Pro sites often causes a significant SDS-PAGE mobility shift (upwards). Ser/Thr to Asp substitition likely do the same. I have been told that this shift is caused by reduced SDS binding.

#4 Sofimek

Sofimek

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 November 2011 - 01:07 PM

Hi all
I agree with Deadaly. One can not tell for sure if the Asp you have substituted affect folding unless and other wise it is proven by experiments.

I am currently working with novel protein and substituted Asp to Ala (in contrary to what you did) in order to see the role of Asp. But now I am struggling to get this mutated protein expressed. I tried too many times with different conditions, but no protein :( Anyhow, I am thinking that the Asp that I mutated has something with the protein's structure.

If the secondary structure of your protein is known, you can check the position and role of those amino acids you have mutated.

Btw, have you considered the molecular weight difference of your modified protein from the WT?? The modified might have been lighter as you see fast running bands.

SofiMek

#5 Bluefunk

Bluefunk

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 20 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 09 December 2011 - 04:38 PM

Increased negative charge on a protein, such as phosphorylation can slow the migration of your band on a SDS-PAGE. The increased negative charge causes it to bind less SDS therefore changes its charge:mass ratio

Edited by Bluefunk, 09 December 2011 - 04:38 PM.





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.