Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Co-author in big paper vs first author in not-so-big paper


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Penguiny

Penguiny

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 14 October 2011 - 12:31 AM

Hi! I'm a newly minted postdoc and just starting out on a project. I have some preliminary results which are very promising, so I drafted out the project outline to aim towards a publication, which I will be the first author. But when I showed my outline to my PI, he said he wants to split up the data sets in the outline, each will go to his two other projects that are already quite mature, and one of them at least, will be in a big paper. I see how it is advantageous for the research group and him since instead of a few of medium quality publications, he gets at least 1 big paper if not 2. The problem is, I will only be a co-author of the big paper this way. My question is, is it more valuable for my career prospects to be a co-author of a big paper or the first author of a not-so-big paper?

Any advice?

Thanks!

#2 Papaver

Papaver

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 77 posts
19
Good

Posted 14 October 2011 - 03:20 AM

I think for your career it's always better to have some first author paper. What das not-so-big mean? Not so big as Science, Nature or Cell? There are a lot of good journals. Is it possible to be a joined first paper at at least paper? Maybe you can make a compromise especially if big paper means publishing in the big journals.

#3 allynspear

allynspear

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 83 posts
10
Good

Posted 14 October 2011 - 05:44 AM

These days the difference between "not-so-big" and "big" journals is becoming less and less. Yes, if you publish a first author paper in Science, Nature, Cell, PNAS, that is good for your career. But co-author papers, even in "big" journals, are never worth as much as a first author publication. When you are looking for a job, the number of first author publications will be primarily what people are looking at, and the type of journal will only be secondary. If you were choosing between 1 first author nature paper, or 2 first author Journal of Obscure Specialty papers, always choose the bigger journal. But I would NEVER give up your first authorship without a fight.

#4 Penguiny

Penguiny

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 16 October 2011 - 05:14 PM

Thanks! I see now that I have to argue for my first author paper. Sigh, it's not gg to be an easy fight...




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.