how to seperate double-digestion products on agarose gel
#1
Posted 27 September 2011 - 11:13 AM
So I wonder is it possible they can be seperated?
Any suggestions are welcome!
#2
Posted 27 September 2011 - 12:04 PM
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#3
Posted 27 September 2011 - 12:31 PM
hobglobin, on 27 September 2011 - 12:04 PM, said:
Thank you for your fast reply!
BTW, do you think it can be solved by increasing agarose concentation, like 2%? Becuase it will be more convinient.
Thanks!
#4
Posted 27 September 2011 - 02:49 PM
#5
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:47 PM
#6
Posted 28 September 2011 - 05:21 AM
phage434, on 27 September 2011 - 03:47 PM, said:
Thanks, it looks it is a good idea.
But I am wondering restriction enzyme can really 100% cut the fragment which I don't want, otherwise, this contaminatant will influence my futher ligation with another vector.
#7
Posted 28 September 2011 - 05:41 AM
bob1, on 27 September 2011 - 02:49 PM, said:
I just tired to run with 1 hour at 130 voltage with 1% agarose, but these two bands still can not be seperated.
Attachment is the picture.
#8
Posted 28 September 2011 - 07:11 AM
#9
Posted 28 September 2011 - 07:11 AM
#10
Posted 28 September 2011 - 07:26 AM
leelee, on 28 September 2011 - 07:11 AM, said:
It is a good idea!
I wonder how big your bands can be seperated in this case? My two fragments: one is 2.2kb, and the other is 2.3kb.
Thanks!
#11
Posted 28 September 2011 - 07:34 AM
Best of Luck.
#12
Posted 28 September 2011 - 09:00 AM
Biogareth, on 28 September 2011 - 07:26 AM, said:
leelee, on 28 September 2011 - 07:11 AM, said:
It is a good idea!
I wonder how big your bands can be seperated in this case? My two fragments: one is 2.2kb, and the other is 2.3kb.
Thanks!
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#13
Posted 28 September 2011 - 06:21 PM
Quote
Interesting, I've never seen this, doesn't happen for me. Perhaps if the voltage was excessively low you might see that? But then again I've even run my gels over the weekend at as low as 20V (after an initial run of a couple of hours at 70V) and my bands are still able to be clearly resolved. I wonder, how can the DNA diffuse if you keep the voltage on?
Having said that, for your purpose, Biogareth, I don't know if this will work for your case (sorry didn't properly read you the first time so didn't realise the size difference was so small), as although you might be able to tell difference between bands of similar size, they are probably still too close to be certain you haven't got any contamination from the other band when you excise from the gel (particularly when you consider the points allynspear makes).
I tend to agree with phage and allynspear and think that the use of another RE is the way to go.
What are you using your fragment of interest for?
#14
Posted 29 September 2011 - 10:40 AM
leelee, on 28 September 2011 - 06:21 PM, said:
Quote
Interesting, I've never seen this, doesn't happen for me. Perhaps if the voltage was excessively low you might see that? But then again I've even run my gels over the weekend at as low as 20V (after an initial run of a couple of hours at 70V) and my bands are still able to be clearly resolved. I wonder, how can the DNA diffuse if you keep the voltage on?
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#15
Posted 29 September 2011 - 06:26 PM
I guess if its not a problem for us, I won't worry about it














