Baroudeur, on 30 August 2011 - 02:04 AM, said:
Hi guys,
Anybody sees any drawbacks to performing PCR directly on a bacterial colony (ie. E. coli) ??
Agreed with phage434. For me, if I want to clone a gene from a bacteria, I will just use colony PCR instead of performing DNA extraction (although I do a quite different method from what phage434 suggested, not sure whether it is publishable...). The draw back would be reduced sensitivity, but it doesn't really bother's me in my case. IT all depends on your application.
susanna, on 31 August 2011 - 12:09 AM, said:
Hi,
i was wondering the same thing:
1) so if you cloned a part of a gene in a plasmid, you can perform PCR straight on the plasmid, using the same forward and reverse primer you would use to amplify the gene on the patient samples?
2)Do you then need the plasmids to perform PCR, or is it possible to use the E.coli with the plasmid within as inputmaterial? Cause i assume that you first have to perform cell lysis of the E.coli bacteria to yield the plasmid?
greetz
1) yes
2) if your cloned genes doesn't resemble any part of E. coli, you can possibly do that (I will suggest you run -ve ctrl by using just E.coli without plasmid). I usually use colony PCR to screen and select for my +ve clones. This is because in the first step of your PCR cycle where you are heating in 95C for few minutes, it is good enough to break down the bacterial cell wall.
Hope I answer your question
Rgs,
Adrian
Expecting the world to treat you fairly because you are a good person is like expecting the lion not to attack you because you are a vegetarian.
..."best of our knowledge, as far as we know this had never been reported before, though I can't possible read all the published journals on earth, but by perform thorough search in google, the keywords did not match any documents"...
"what doesn’t kill you, makes you stronger"---Goddess Casandra reminds me to be strong
"It's all just DNA. Do it."---phage434