Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Is one reference gene ever appropriate?


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 DH1

DH1

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 15 June 2011 - 01:10 PM

So I am relatively new to qPCR and have read much in the literature about not using single reference genes and trying to use as many as three different genes for normalisation. However, if the Ct values are identical between runs for a reference gene, does this not show its stability? In this case, is one gene OK, or are more still needed?

#2 Vinod

Vinod

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 17 June 2011 - 04:03 AM

I am also trying to get the answer of this question? If you find please intimate me.

#3 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,152 posts
101
Excellent

Posted 21 June 2011 - 03:41 AM

I would say that one stable housekeeping gene is better that three unstable ones. If your gene is stable, then it should suffice, but if you're writing a paper, reviewer may require more. Or not, that depends. Some people publish suspicious results with actin for years because "it's used everywhere" not caring about the real stability in certain situation. So if you say you tested five housekeepings and selected two most stable ones, it sounds better. Maybe you can test more and use two best, or just write, that you considered the stability and this one was stable so you use it in normalisation.

Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon


#4 phz@nebion.com

phz@nebion.com

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 06 October 2011 - 11:06 AM

It is generally recommended to work with several reference genes, ideally three or more. I agree with the previous post that one stable reference is better than three unstable ones... but what about using three stable ones?
There's a free online tool called RefGenes that helps you to find candidate reference genes for tissues of interest. The tool is open access and available at www.refgenes.org. RefGenes compiles data from thousands of microarrays and gives you the most stable genes for a chosen set on microarrays (i.e. those done on your tissue of interest).
- Philip, Zurich, Switzerland




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.