Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

How to explain this luciferase result?!


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Samantha

Samantha

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 46 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 04 June 2011 - 12:49 AM

Hi,

I have performed dual luciferase reporter asay to check if my microRNA binds to the potential target gene.  I co-transfected the  luciferase reporter wit the 3UTR (psicheck) and my microRNA, but i didnt observe any changes in the renilla/firefly ratio, compared to cotransfection with the vector control of the microRNA. However, when i co-transfected microRNA with the mutated 3'UTR luciferase vector, the ratio increased, compared to the empty vector of miRNA as well as the wild-type form. How to explain this weird result?

a) wild-type luciferase reporter + empty vector : 1
B) wild-type luciferase reporter +microRNA: 1

c) mutant luciferase reporter +empty vector: 1
d) mutant luciferase reporter + microRNA: 1.3

Samantha

#2 pcrman

pcrman

    Epigenetist

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,035 posts
46
Excellent

Posted 05 June 2011 - 08:57 AM

Luciferase assay especially dual assay is subject to many errors and biases. Combinatory transfection of other nucleic acids such as plasmids or small RNAs makes the interpretation of results more complicated and error prone. The 1.3 fold increase probably is just artifact and doesn't tell anything.

#3 whitedolphin

whitedolphin

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 23 July 2011 - 08:39 PM

View Postpcrman, on 05 June 2011 - 08:57 AM, said:

Luciferase assay especially dual assay is subject to many errors and biases. Combinatory transfection of other nucleic acids such as plasmids or small RNAs makes the interpretation of results more complicated and error prone. The 1.3 fold increase probably is just artifact and doesn't tell anything.
I also met a problem to explain the Dual-Luciferase:
there are two miRNA binding sites predicted to target at the gene, and mutation seed region of each sites can relieve the repression of miRNA to 3-5 fold of that in wildtype. However, the unexpected result is that double mutation strengthen the repression instead of removing the repression by this miRNA. What's wrong with it?


________|_luc-UTR__|__luc-UTRm1__|__luc-UTRm2__|_luc-UTRm1&2_|
Empty___|_1.000____|____1.018____|____1.166____|____0.985____|
miRNA___|_0.037____|____0.216____|____0.127____|____0.003____|


Any suggestion are appreciated! :rolleyes:

Edited by whitedolphin, 23 July 2011 - 08:59 PM.





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.