Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

optimal size for 3'UTR cloning


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 swatcats

swatcats

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 12 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 19 April 2011 - 04:56 PM

Hi all,
       I understand that the field of miRNA is very emerging and there is a lot of data which is being added each day to add to the existing knowledge and maybe add to a paradigm shift in our understanding of non-coding RNAs. Since I'm new to this field and am following experimental systems in the literature, can anybody help me in understanding how people report success with 3'UTR assays when they say they have cloned in part as opposed to the complete 3'UTR?
Would really appreciate your suggestions and inputs

Thanks

#2 pcrman

pcrman

    Epigenetist

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,015 posts
43
Excellent

Posted 19 April 2011 - 07:49 PM

I don't think there is consensus regarding what kind of 3UTR reporter assay is more accurate. Several strategies have been used in the literature:

full-length 3'UTR cloning
partial 3' UTR cloning
cloning of a single miRNA target site with a few flanking bases
cloning multiple miRNA targets in tandem

There are pros and cons for each method. For example, the full-length 3UTR reporter assay should in theory provide the most accurate readout, in the same time it complicates the assay by exposing other potential target sites to miRNA targeting.

#3 swatcats

swatcats

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 12 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 20 April 2011 - 01:03 PM

Thanks for your helpful inputs

I'm beginning with partial 3'UTR cloning...lets see how that goes!!




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.