I do viral transfection (retro) made with Plat-E cells,
and I normally use 0.22um filter to remove cell debris from supernatant
but I just found some papers using 0.45um filter instead.
which is better? or no change??
Let me know your opinion or routine.
Thanks in advance
Filter for viral transfection
Started by Rnotk, Apr 04 2011 03:15 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 04 April 2011 - 03:15 PM
#2
Posted 04 April 2011 - 03:53 PM
For the virus it shouldn't matter, both filter sizes are much bigger than a virus. 0.45 will get rid of most bacteria I think. A 0.22 um filter will get rid of all but mycoplasma.
#3
Posted 04 April 2011 - 08:22 PM
In general people do not recomend the 0.22 filter (they specifically mention it in most protocols)because you reduce the titer of the virus big time.
I always use 0.45 filters (but I never checked what happens with the 0.22 filter)
I always use 0.45 filters (but I never checked what happens with the 0.22 filter)
"He must be very ignorant for he answers every question he is asked" Voltaire
"This is SPARTA!"
"I´m the goddamn batman"
"This is SPARTA!"
"I´m the goddamn batman"
#4
Posted 05 April 2011 - 07:16 AM
thanks everybody
I will switch to 0.45
Thanks
I will switch to 0.45
Thanks
#5
Posted 05 April 2011 - 10:48 AM
Yep. Me too. I always use 0.45 syringe filter.
laurequillo, on 04 April 2011 - 08:22 PM, said:
In general people do not recomend the 0.22 filter (they specifically mention it in most protocols)because you reduce the titer of the virus big time.
I always use 0.45 filters (but I never checked what happens with the 0.22 filter)
I always use 0.45 filters (but I never checked what happens with the 0.22 filter)














