Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

help with his tagged protein purification


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 pgrover

pgrover

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 01 April 2011 - 12:56 PM

Hi everyone,

I work with two proteins that have a pI of 7.8(A) and 7.1 (B) respectively, they are both ~26kDa each and are his-tagged.

I started purifying protein A (pI 7.8) using the GE healthcare hitrap column, charged with Ni ions. I use the following buffers:
Binding buffer: 20mM tris, 0.5M NaCl, 20mM imidazole, 5mM BME, 10% glycerol, pH 8.3
Wash buffer: 20mM tris, 20mM imidazole, 5mM BME, 10% glycerol, pH 8.3
Elution buffer: 20mM tris, 1M imidazole, 5mM BME, 10% glycerol, pH 8.3
I got nice and clean bands from the his column, and then put it on GF column to dilute imidazole out and further purify the protein. I used the following buffer:20mM tris, 100mM NaCl, 3mM DTT, pH 8.3
I got a very broad peak from that and the protein was eluted in ~200mL buffer. I also lost a large amount of protein at this step.
So, next I decided to dialyze the protein into dialysis buffer (20mM tris, 100mM NaCl, 3mM DTT, pH 8.3). Almost all the protein precipitated out of solution (more than 90%).For dialysis, I did 1hr, o/n, 1 hr at 4C.
After I purify this protein, I need to label it with a fluorophore. The optimum conditions for this are pH 6.5-7.5 in a phosphate based buffer.

I started purifying protein B (pI 7.1) using the GE healthcare hitrap column, charged with Ni ions. I used the same buffers as described above.
Again, I got nice and clean bands from the his column, and then dialyzed it under different conditions.
a. 20mM tris, 100mM NaCl, 3mM DTT, pH 8.3
b. 20mM tris, 200mM NaCl, 3mM DTT, pH 8.3
c. 20mM tris, 500mM NaCl, 3mM DTT, pH 8.3
d. 0.1M phosphate, 100mM NaCl, 3mM DTT pH 6.5
e. 0.1M phosphate, 200mM NaCl, 3mM DTT pH 6.5
f. 0.1M phosphate, 500mM NaCl, 3mM DTT pH 6.5
For tris based buffers, I did not get any precipitation.
For phosphate based buffers, I again got a lot of precipitation and lost ~90% protein.

So, I think that the proteins are precipitating because of the pH range. I am in a difficult situation because all pH values are in the same range.
When I move from pH 8.3 to 6.5, the proteins precipitate at their pIs (7.1 and 7.8) But I need the final pH in the range of 6.5-7.5
So, now I have decided to use a phosphate based buffer for the his purification at pH 6.5. When I searched literature, I found that the optimum pH for these columns is 7-8. Some people suggest using low pH for eluting the protein (instead of imidazole). Do you think I'll be fine if I change the pH for all buffers to 6.5 (phosphate based) and continue everything else the same way?
Also, do you have any other suggestions or comments regarding this?

Please reply at the earliest, thanks for your help!

#2 protolder

protolder

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 293 posts
9
Neutral

Posted 03 April 2011 - 09:53 PM

Hola I donīt see any problem in running the nickel colum at ph 6.5 from the begining and making your extracts at this pH with phosphate and tthe other components 20mM imidazole, NaCl 0.5M , reducer and glycerol.In the quiagen information says thatHis have a pKa of 6.0 and under this value starts to be protonated, so doesnīt bound to the nickel ions, for that pH dropwise is used for elution, monomers elute at 5.9 and multimers at 4.5. Buena suerte




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.