Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

- - - - -

Additional peaks in cell cycle assay


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Bonsai

Bonsai

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 21 March 2011 - 12:37 AM

Hi!

I am perfoming cell cycle measurements with primary cardiac fibroblasts. Recently, I have added an RNase treatment step (37°C, 30min) to my protocol, which now gives me much sharper peaks. However, I suddenly have two new problems, which somehow must have to be related to this RNase treatment: First, in the FL2-W/FL2-A plot, I observe two long, horizontal lines for the G1/G0 and G2/M populations (indicative of massive cell clustering?). Second, additional smaller peaks appear in the FL2-A histogram, as if there were cells containing 6n and 8n of chromosomes. The latter problem, I haven't found anywhere in literature. I have attached an example of the FL2-W/FL2-A plot.

These are the protocols, which I have used:

Without RNase treatment:
1) Trypsinise cells, wash them once in citrate buffer and fix them by adding 100% EtOH forcibly expelled form the pipet. Vortex shortly and store at -20°C (at least o/n)
2) Centrifugation, resuspension in citrate buffer
3) Addition of PI / Na2HPO4 buffer immediately before FACS analysis

With RNase treatment:
1) Heat inactivation of contaminating DNases in RNase solution (99°C, 5min) and storage in aliquots at -20°C
2) Steps 1+2 as described above
3) Addition RNase + PI / Na2HPO4 buffer 37°C, 30min
4) FACS analysis

Does anyone have a clue, what these problems could mean and why they appear only after prolonged incubation with the PI buffer or RNase?

Thx in advance for you hints!

Attached Thumbnails

  • Cell cycle problem.png


#2 Denis Baev

Denis Baev

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 53 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 21 March 2011 - 05:04 AM

You have to check the distribution of your cells on FL2-A vs FL-2H dotplot to exclude aggreagates from the analysis.

#3 Bonsai

Bonsai

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 22 March 2011 - 12:25 AM

Hi Denis, I am using FL2-W vs. FL2-A to exclude aggregates because I find this most frequently described. But FL2-H vs. FL2-A would certainly also work for this purpose. I am pretty sure that the long "tails" would also turn up in that plot, and the additional peaks in FL2-A anyway.

#4 Rsm

Rsm

    Post Dog

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 361 posts
4
Neutral

Posted 22 March 2011 - 05:00 AM

Can you decrease your FL-2 voltage? That may help to get rid of the horizontal lines. I have also repeatedly observed the additional peaks (also using RNase). If you follow www.unmc.edu/media/cellanalysis/cell_cycle_fundamentals.doc you'll find a solution: simply gating them out. Which I find close to cheating, but hey, it looks good, so who cares?  :P
I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

#5 Bonsai

Bonsai

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 22 March 2011 - 07:28 AM

Very interesting, PostDog! So you also observe (weaker) horizontal lines/additional peaks beyond the G2/M peak?! Did you ever find this problem mentioned somewhere?

Concerning the FL2 voltage: I adjusted it in such a way that the G1 peak is at 200 in FL2-A and G2/M is at 400. This is also what is recommended by the manual that you mention. I would have no problem to gate the debris out, if there was a clearly distinct single cell population but you just cannot tell, where the debris starts! The manual you cite says the same
("           When analyzing the data in the cell cycle analysis program, use the single cell gate to exclude debris and aggregates -- so long as they are not continuous with the single cell population.")

#6 Rsm

Rsm

    Post Dog

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 361 posts
4
Neutral

Posted 22 March 2011 - 09:03 AM

Well, I would say that the manual that I mentioned shows them as well in every scatter plot... Not as pronounced as your data, but quite similar. I would gate this data out, you never know if your cells are maybe 8n, and what impact that may have on their cell cycle. Here's some more data: http://science.cance...ide/?version=1.
I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

#7 Bonsai

Bonsai

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 24 March 2011 - 12:49 AM

Thx for the interesting link, Rsm!
There is one fundamental difference: The horizontal lines in this manual and the one you mentioned earlier only show doublets ("horizontal lines") behind the G2/M population, whereas I observe also a line behind the G1/G0 population (+ additional lines at higher "n"). If I assume the line behind the G1/G0 population (2n) are doublets, the single cells would be 1n and that is certainly not the case! So I think gating them out is not allowed here.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.