I'm trying to lyse small volumes of E coli cells, bind the proteins to IMAC resin, then elute them for SDS-PAGE analysis. I'm thinking of using a detergent-based lysis buffer like B-Per and BugBuster. I've tried 1% Triton-X in PBS but it doesn't seem to be lysing very well. I've used BugBuster before and I could see the cells clarify almost immediately and they use non-ionic detergent. Does anyone have any suggestion which detergents I should try and at what concentration? SDS is out as it's incompatible with IMAC resin.
Detergent-based lysis buffer reciipe for E coli
Started by donny, Feb 12 2011 04:05 AM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 12 February 2011 - 04:05 AM
#2
Posted 12 February 2011 - 08:04 AM
i would use Triton X-100 (0.1%) and lysozyme (0.2 mg/ml) in column buffer (i think something like 300 mM NaCl in 50 mM NaHPO4, pH 8) ...lysozyme will do the job pretty well and will not interfere with the IMAC.
Regards,
p
Regards,
p
donny, on 12 February 2011 - 04:05 AM, said:
I'm trying to lyse small volumes of E coli cells, bind the proteins to IMAC resin, then elute them for SDS-PAGE analysis. I'm thinking of using a detergent-based lysis buffer like B-Per and BugBuster. I've tried 1% Triton-X in PBS but it doesn't seem to be lysing very well. I've used BugBuster before and I could see the cells clarify almost immediately and they use non-ionic detergent. Does anyone have any suggestion which detergents I should try and at what concentration? SDS is out as it's incompatible with IMAC resin.
#3
Posted 13 February 2011 - 01:52 AM
How about incubation time? I have to check if we have lysozyme though.
I read the information on B-Per and the detergents in there are removable by dialysis. That seems to imply that they are using octyl thioglucoside/glucoside and CHAPS/CHAPSO. Are these detergent any stronger than Triton-X?
I read the information on B-Per and the detergents in there are removable by dialysis. That seems to imply that they are using octyl thioglucoside/glucoside and CHAPS/CHAPSO. Are these detergent any stronger than Triton-X?
#4
Posted 13 February 2011 - 02:11 AM
lysis time very much depends on the amount of cells you have in your pellet ...i would assume 15 min @RT should do the job.
No idea if octyl thioglucoside/glucoside and CHAPS/CHAPSO is a stronger detergent than Triton-X100, sorry!
Regards,
p
No idea if octyl thioglucoside/glucoside and CHAPS/CHAPSO is a stronger detergent than Triton-X100, sorry!
Regards,
p
donny, on 13 February 2011 - 01:52 AM, said:
How about incubation time? I have to check if we have lysozyme though.
I read the information on B-Per and the detergents in there are removable by dialysis. That seems to imply that they are using octyl thioglucoside/glucoside and CHAPS/CHAPSO. Are these detergent any stronger than Triton-X?
I read the information on B-Per and the detergents in there are removable by dialysis. That seems to imply that they are using octyl thioglucoside/glucoside and CHAPS/CHAPSO. Are these detergent any stronger than Triton-X?
#5
Posted 18 February 2011 - 03:44 AM
Ok, I've just tried the lysozyme lysis. Just as a trial, I lysed pelleted cells from 1mL overnight culture with 500uL 1mg/mL lysozyme in 20mM Na phosphate buffer, 0.1% triton x-100. Immediately, I see the suspension turn clumpy. Is that lysis or some kind of precipitation? There's no increased viscosity associated with genomic DNA. Am I doing it right?
Still curious about the composition of commercial detergent formulation or related recipe for cell lysis, if anyone has any suggestion.
Still curious about the composition of commercial detergent formulation or related recipe for cell lysis, if anyone has any suggestion.
#6
Posted 18 February 2011 - 05:10 AM
B-Per uses octyl glucoside, according to the patent.
#7
Posted 24 February 2011 - 07:02 AM
Have you considered an acid labile surfactant or a cell lysis kit that uses one? I use it frequently because the E. coli lysates that I prepare are typically analyzed by MS and most detergents interfere with that. Downstream processing becomes much easier because you can cleave the surfactant by lowering the pH to 2.5 to 3 (with TFA or formic acid). I looked over the specs of the IMAC resin and they suggest using a 50 mM PBS buffer, which from my experience would easily overcome a pH of 3 and allow that resin to work effectively.
Edited by proteaMatt, 24 February 2011 - 07:03 AM.
Lab Technician at Protea Biosciences














