Hi all,
We are often told that the human genomes share 99% sequence identity and I am a little bit confused about such an "assumption".
How can we claim this finding while we never sequenced all human genomes in the world to know and compare their sequences and conclude results! So, how this high percentage of sequence identity was concluded for all people (i.e. ~ 6 billion humans)?!
How we could be sure that all people on earth have this high percentage of sequence identity?
Since the human genome was sequenced using the DNA of few individuals, and unless we sequence all human genomes in the world, how we could be sure that human beings share 99% sequence identity?
I am a little bit confused about this issue.
Does somebody has any clear idea ?
Thanks for any feedback
About human DNA sequence identity
Started by Biog, Dec 04 2010 07:53 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 04 December 2010 - 07:53 PM
One question asked, knowledge expanded!
#2
Posted 05 December 2010 - 02:12 PM
This sounds a lot like homework... so only some things to think about.
Conservation of genes and the number of people sequenced for some genes.
Recent study showing Japanese having different genome(I'm sure if you do a web search you'll find it).
Conservation of genes and the number of people sequenced for some genes.
Recent study showing Japanese having different genome(I'm sure if you do a web search you'll find it).
#3
Posted 06 December 2010 - 08:36 PM
bob1, on 05 December 2010 - 02:12 PM, said:
This sounds a lot like homework...
No it is not!
bob1, on 05 December 2010 - 02:12 PM, said:
Conservation of genes and the number of people sequenced for some genes
Does sequencing of some genes in number of people is enough to claim that humans (all people on earth) share 99% sequence identity? Without speaking about other genomes and other species (that we also claim having a high percentage of sequence identities with their genomes!)
bob1, on 05 December 2010 - 02:12 PM, said:
Recent study showing Japanese having different genome (I'm sure if you do a web search you'll find it).
Unless we sequence all genomes, claiming similarity betweens species or humans as high as 99% isn't an overstatement based on theoretical assumption only??
Edited by Biog, 06 December 2010 - 08:37 PM.
One question asked, knowledge expanded!
#4
Posted 07 December 2010 - 08:17 AM
to be human you must share a certain set of genes. despite variations, such as snps, deletions and other mutations, the vast majority of bases in the gene sequences will be the same. certainly more than 99%.
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
#5
Posted 07 December 2010 - 10:21 PM
I got this from wikipedia:
"The haploid human genome occupies a total of just over 3 billion DNA base pairs."
So, even if we are just 1% different from each other, 1% of 6 billion bp should be enough to accomodate known and to be discovered mutation in us...
"The haploid human genome occupies a total of just over 3 billion DNA base pairs."
So, even if we are just 1% different from each other, 1% of 6 billion bp should be enough to accomodate known and to be discovered mutation in us...
NEW!!!! Does lack of plants mean End of Photosynthesis on Earth on CoffeeTableScience!!!!
Image copyright: Adrian Koh SF.
Replication of this art is strictly prohibited without express permission of the artist
Image copyright: Adrian Koh SF.
Replication of this art is strictly prohibited without express permission of the artist
#6
Posted 08 December 2010 - 03:59 AM
How do we know that there are 6 billion people in the world when we never counted them all? How do we know that if you flip a coin enough times it will come up 50% heads and 50% tails? Statistics.
#7
Posted 11 December 2010 - 06:20 PM
Yes, but to do good statistics, we have to sequence hundreds and hundreds of genomes!
One question asked, knowledge expanded!














