Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Filter paper thickness?


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 yuriy

yuriy

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 25 November 2010 - 07:13 AM

Hi there,

I have been doing some histology and in preparing the solutions for Mallory Trichrome Stain I discovered that the filtration rates for Solution A (1% Acid Fuchsin) and Solution C (2% Orange G, 0.5% Aniline Blue, 2% Oxalic Acid) is excruciatingly slow. I have been using Whatman's filter papers (90mm, Cat No 1001 090), which seems to be fairly standard, but I would really like to order something that's not as thick. Off hand I wasn't able to find any indications of thickness on their online catalogue, so I was wondering if anyone perchance knew an alternative they could recommend.

Thanks!

#2 hobglobin

hobglobin

    Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional...

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,525 posts
97
Excellent

Posted 25 November 2010 - 10:33 AM

It depends more on pore size. Whatman's website gives for your filterpaper Grade 1 with 11 Ám (Particle retention in liquid) and a typical thickness of 180 Ám. A filter paper for routine applications with medium retention and flow rate.
If you want a faster one you could use for example grade 591 (Medium fast, thick) or 595 (Medium fast, thin). Those faster papers of course won't have the sample particle retention properties as the one you used, i.e. fine particles might go through the paper. What you need depends finally how fine your particles are and if it is acceptable that some particles might pass through the paper or not. There is a pdf as decision support to pick the right filter paper for your application on the website.
Finally if you need fast and fine filtration, a suction strainer might be useful for you.
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.