Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Please help microarray beginner


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 evilid

evilid

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 26 October 2010 - 10:00 PM

Hell0, everyone.
I am trying to troubleshoot my DNA microarray.
Any help will be appreciated.

I am trying ChIP-on-chip.
I am using Agilent system and following the instruction of the company without modification.
I tried it once with a person who has lots of experience and it was pretty much successful.
However this time I tried on my own and it seems to be failed.

Basically I think I got very weak signal.
Previously I had nice green and red dots on black background after scanning.
This time I got weak and grainy dots on very strong green background.

I would like to ask two questions.

1. Why do I get green background? If my labeling or hybridization didn't work well, shouldn't I get very dim dots on black background. Why green background? Does the scanner have a sort of compensation function? Does it try to get as much as signal by increasing laser power when the signals are weak?

2. How would I improve my labeling? More specifically, how would I make sure labeling is adequate? The instruction says that I need at least 2 pmol/ul for Cy5 and 3 pmol/ul for Cy3. I got 5.9 and 8.0, respectively. Does this mean that I got too much incorporation or that I have lots of unlabeled dye on my samples due to insufficient washing?

Thank you very much.

#2 Clare

Clare

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 181 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 28 October 2010 - 06:40 AM

Hi there :)

I have done hundreds of chip-chips with Agilent slides - can you tell us your entire protocol (from labelling to hybridisation to washing)?

If you are using the Agilent scanner and software, I know that if you do have very weak signals, the background colours can look wierd.

In terms of improving your labelling, I would need to see you protocol first :)

Regards
Clare


Hell0, everyone.
I am trying to troubleshoot my DNA microarray.
Any help will be appreciated.

I am trying ChIP-on-chip.
I am using Agilent system and following the instruction of the company without modification.
I tried it once with a person who has lots of experience and it was pretty much successful.
However this time I tried on my own and it seems to be failed.

Basically I think I got very weak signal.
Previously I had nice green and red dots on black background after scanning.
This time I got weak and grainy dots on very strong green background.

I would like to ask two questions.

1. Why do I get green background? If my labeling or hybridization didn't work well, shouldn't I get very dim dots on black background. Why green background? Does the scanner have a sort of compensation function? Does it try to get as much as signal by increasing laser power when the signals are weak?

2. How would I improve my labeling? More specifically, how would I make sure labeling is adequate? The instruction says that I need at least 2 pmol/ul for Cy5 and 3 pmol/ul for Cy3. I got 5.9 and 8.0, respectively. Does this mean that I got too much incorporation or that I have lots of unlabeled dye on my samples due to insufficient washing?

Thank you very much.



#3 evilid

evilid

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 28 October 2010 - 04:39 PM

Hello, Clare.

I am EXACTLY following Agilent Mammalian ChIP-on-chip Protocol version 10.11.
We basically use this as a working protocol without any modification (reagent companies, sonicator brand, amounts of reactions and so on.)
I am doing 4x18K custom chips.

What I am suspecting is inefficient removal or unincorporated dyes or inefficient blocking.
However I do not have expertise on this matter.
For example I am not sure whether I can wash labeled samples more extensively or not.
Also I am not sure how I can check labeling efficiency other than O.D.

Thank you for your help.


Hi there :)

I have done hundreds of chip-chips with Agilent slides - can you tell us your entire protocol (from labelling to hybridisation to washing)?

If you are using the Agilent scanner and software, I know that if you do have very weak signals, the background colours can look wierd.

In terms of improving your labelling, I would need to see you protocol first :)

Regards
Clare



Hell0, everyone.
I am trying to troubleshoot my DNA microarray.
Any help will be appreciated.

I am trying ChIP-on-chip.
I am using Agilent system and following the instruction of the company without modification.
I tried it once with a person who has lots of experience and it was pretty much successful.
However this time I tried on my own and it seems to be failed.

Basically I think I got very weak signal.
Previously I had nice green and red dots on black background after scanning.
This time I got weak and grainy dots on very strong green background.

I would like to ask two questions.

1. Why do I get green background? If my labeling or hybridization didn't work well, shouldn't I get very dim dots on black background. Why green background? Does the scanner have a sort of compensation function? Does it try to get as much as signal by increasing laser power when the signals are weak?

2. How would I improve my labeling? More specifically, how would I make sure labeling is adequate? The instruction says that I need at least 2 pmol/ul for Cy5 and 3 pmol/ul for Cy3. I got 5.9 and 8.0, respectively. Does this mean that I got too much incorporation or that I have lots of unlabeled dye on my samples due to insufficient washing?

Thank you very much.



#4 Clare

Clare

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 181 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 29 October 2010 - 12:30 AM

Hi :)

Are you using the Agilent oven for your hybs? I never got a nice result using their oven, so switched to an Implen SlideBooster. I'll read the protocol and see if I can spot any potential issues...

but in the meantime...

What do your DNA samples look like before labelling? Do you use a nanodrop - what are the ratios?

FYI: I used this labelling kit from Invitrogen which gave fantastic results - it's not cheap though :(

http://products.invi...=search-product (BioPrime® Total for Agilent® aCGH)

Clare



[quote name='evilid' timestamp='1288312786' post='90778']
Hello, Clare.

I am EXACTLY following Agilent Mammalian ChIP-on-chip Protocol version 10.11.
We basically use this as a working protocol without any modification (reagent companies, sonicator brand, amounts of reactions and so on.)
I am doing 4x18K custom chips.

What I am suspecting is inefficient removal or unincorporated dyes or inefficient blocking.
However I do not have expertise on this matter.
For example I am not sure whether I can wash labeled samples more extensively or not.
Also I am not sure how I can check labeling efficiency other than O.D.

Thank you for your help.

#5 evilid

evilid

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 31 October 2010 - 05:13 PM

Hi, Clare.
Yes, we do have Agilent oven.
Our system was purchased as a package from Agilent.
I will look into another option on this matter.

My DNA samples look okay on agarose gel after LM-PCR.
Nice smearing at around 300-500bp.
Amounts were around 4-5 ug.

After labeling, Input was 0.31ug/ml (5.9pmol/ul), IgG contol was 0.35ug/ml (8.0pmol/ul) and my IP sample was 0.3ug/ml (8.5pmol/ul) according to Nanodrop measurement.

Thank you.

#6 Clare

Clare

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 181 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 01 November 2010 - 03:27 AM

Hello :)

Hmm...from what you have said, it seems like everything is ok with your DNA - do you check your results vis real time PCR before you amplify and label?

Here's my protocol if it's any help:

http://amplispeed.co...lideBooster.pdf

I wonder if your slides look anything like the crap one which is on the PDF?

Clare



Hi, Clare.
Yes, we do have Agilent oven.
Our system was purchased as a package from Agilent.
I will look into another option on this matter.

My DNA samples look okay on agarose gel after LM-PCR.
Nice smearing at around 300-500bp.
Amounts were around 4-5 ug.

After labeling, Input was 0.31ug/ml (5.9pmol/ul), IgG contol was 0.35ug/ml (8.0pmol/ul) and my IP sample was 0.3ug/ml (8.5pmol/ul) according to Nanodrop measurement.

Thank you.



#7 evilid

evilid

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 01 November 2010 - 04:46 PM

Hello, Clare.
I found a new insight with this matter.

Careful comparison with the protocol and my labnote, I found that my hybridization was not ideal.
Basically cotDNA was 1/3 and hybridization solution was 0.33x.
This explains why my slide was all green.

Thank you for your help.
I really appreciate it.

Hello :)

Hmm...from what you have said, it seems like everything is ok with your DNA - do you check your results vis real time PCR before you amplify and label?

Here's my protocol if it's any help:

http://amplispeed.co...lideBooster.pdf

I wonder if your slides look anything like the crap one which is on the PDF?

Clare




Hi, Clare.
Yes, we do have Agilent oven.
Our system was purchased as a package from Agilent.
I will look into another option on this matter.

My DNA samples look okay on agarose gel after LM-PCR.
Nice smearing at around 300-500bp.
Amounts were around 4-5 ug.

After labeling, Input was 0.31ug/ml (5.9pmol/ul), IgG contol was 0.35ug/ml (8.0pmol/ul) and my IP sample was 0.3ug/ml (8.5pmol/ul) according to Nanodrop measurement.

Thank you.






Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.