mite DNA extraction
#1
Posted 28 September 2010 - 07:51 AM
Thank you for your attention .
I am studying about molecular variation on mite.
there are two questions that i am involving. please guide me about these.
1- i need to know how i can extract DNA from mite?, please introduce me some references about that.
2- what is the best method to retain mites?
best regards
Afshin
#2
Posted 28 September 2010 - 08:01 AM
As a starting point I'd try out this one, as it's easy, fast, and you don't have to use hazardous chemicals. The DNA is normally of good quality and sufficient amounts for PCR and cloning experiments, etc:
S. M. Aljanabi & I. Martinez (1997): Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality
genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Research 25(22), 4692–4693.
With to retain you mean to store them dead or alive?
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#4
Posted 28 September 2010 - 08:12 AM
I forgot to ask about the size. If they're really tiny, you might get problems with the DNA amount, though it depends also how you work (I used the method for insects of aphid size and a bit smaller). If possible you can combine several in one tube, but it sounds as if you have to work with single specimen as one sample.
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#5
Posted 28 September 2010 - 08:23 AM
hobglobin, on 28 September 2010 - 08:12 AM, said:
I forgot to ask about the size. If they're really tiny, you might get problems with the DNA amount, though it depends also how you work (I used the method for insects of aphid size and a bit smaller). If possible you can combine several in one tube, but it sounds as if you have to work with single specimen as one sample.
Those are very very tiny , so that to see them we have to use binocular microscope.
#6
Posted 28 September 2010 - 08:33 AM
afshin, on 28 September 2010 - 08:23 AM, said:
hobglobin, on 28 September 2010 - 08:12 AM, said:
I forgot to ask about the size. If they're really tiny, you might get problems with the DNA amount, though it depends also how you work (I used the method for insects of aphid size and a bit smaller). If possible you can combine several in one tube, but it sounds as if you have to work with single specimen as one sample.
Those are very very tiny , so that to see them we have to use binocular microscope.
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#7
Posted 28 September 2010 - 08:44 AM
hobglobin, on 28 September 2010 - 08:33 AM, said:
afshin, on 28 September 2010 - 08:23 AM, said:
hobglobin, on 28 September 2010 - 08:12 AM, said:
I forgot to ask about the size. If they're really tiny, you might get problems with the DNA amount, though it depends also how you work (I used the method for insects of aphid size and a bit smaller). If possible you can combine several in one tube, but it sounds as if you have to work with single specimen as one sample.
Those are very very tiny , so that to see them we have to use binocular microscope.
how much aphids did you use for DNA extraction (in milligram)?
#8
Posted 28 September 2010 - 09:39 AM
afshin, on 28 September 2010 - 08:44 AM, said:
hobglobin, on 28 September 2010 - 08:33 AM, said:
afshin, on 28 September 2010 - 08:23 AM, said:
hobglobin, on 28 September 2010 - 08:12 AM, said:
I forgot to ask about the size. If they're really tiny, you might get problems with the DNA amount, though it depends also how you work (I used the method for insects of aphid size and a bit smaller). If possible you can combine several in one tube, but it sounds as if you have to work with single specimen as one sample.
Those are very very tiny , so that to see them we have to use binocular microscope.
how much aphids did you use for DNA extraction (in milligram)?
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.













