Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Advice on proposal for fellowship


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 MariCYP

MariCYP

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 08 September 2010 - 10:33 PM

Hello Everyone,
So I'm in the final stages of the PhD yay! I will be writing my thesis soon, and I'm currently applying for a postdoctoral fellowship for which I had to write a 3-page proposal. I spent a lot of time researching the literature to come up with the proposal that investigates something new but applying what I have learned during my PhD. So I wrote the proposal, showed it to my boss and he thought it was really good. Now the proposal is in the field of kidney physiology and kidney disease, for one of my projects I also work with a nephrologist/clinical researcher, so this person is an MD not a lab research scientist. I also gave this person my proposal to get some feedback since the proposal has to do with kidney disease, but the hypothesis itself has to do with more basic science, and molecular pharmacology. So my PI really liked my proposal, but the MD said she still had "a bunch of questions" and pretty much seems to not like what I'm proposing, or makes it seem what what I state there is not true (background), but whatever evidence I state there I cite, so I'm not making it up obviously. So my question is, should I just ignore that she does not like my proposal and maybe it's just the MD ego, and she's just not seeing what I'm seeing? and seek the help from another nephrologist who can review my proposal? or should I talk with her about it and go nowhere since she is not going to suggest something constructive but probably would want me to change the whole thing entirely, but I do have confidence in my proposal. Anyhow, let me know what you all think.

Thanks

#2 newborn

newborn

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 71 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 08 September 2010 - 11:36 PM

Hello Everyone,
So I'm in the final stages of the PhD yay! I will be writing my thesis soon, and I'm currently applying for a postdoctoral fellowship for which I had to write a 3-page proposal. I spent a lot of time researching the literature to come up with the proposal that investigates something new but applying what I have learned during my PhD. So I wrote the proposal, showed it to my boss and he thought it was really good. Now the proposal is in the field of kidney physiology and kidney disease, for one of my projects I also work with a nephrologist/clinical researcher, so this person is an MD not a lab research scientist. I also gave this person my proposal to get some feedback since the proposal has to do with kidney disease, but the hypothesis itself has to do with more basic science, and molecular pharmacology. So my PI really liked my proposal, but the MD said she still had "a bunch of questions" and pretty much seems to not like what I'm proposing, or makes it seem what what I state there is not true (background), but whatever evidence I state there I cite, so I'm not making it up obviously. So my question is, should I just ignore that she does not like my proposal and maybe it's just the MD ego, and she's just not seeing what I'm seeing? and seek the help from another nephrologist who can review my proposal? or should I talk with her about it and go nowhere since she is not going to suggest something constructive but probably would want me to change the whole thing entirely, but I do have confidence in my proposal. Anyhow, let me know what you all think.

Thanks


You are lucky to have that MD who gave some critical comment. You can ask her to point out your fault in your proposal. Some MD may has practical aims that basic researcher doesnot have.

If you dont think her comment is constructive, we are please to here one. Could you please just post one here?

#3 Adrian K

Adrian K

    Legendary Graduate Beggar

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 708 posts
28
Excellent

Posted 09 September 2010 - 03:36 AM

If I understand correctly, do you mean MD as (Medical Doctor / Medical Doctorate) ?

I am working with one MD. From my experience, as long as they are medical doctor, they will only concern how your research outcome will benefits the patient rather than basic science development. I mean, I could be wrong because my comment doesn't realy mean the whole population of MD... LOL...

In other words, you might had developed a new drug and maybe even can correctly shown the drugs biochemical pathway, but this is very less likely to impress them because they can't see how the patient is being benefited. But if you developed a drug, tested on animal and clinical tested on humans, do a statistical analysis and most likely they will be impressed.

But then, please find out what your MD says first and see whether her comment is constructive.

Edited by adrian kohsf, 09 September 2010 - 03:38 AM.

Expecting the world to treat you fairly because you are a good person is like expecting the lion not to attack you because you are a vegetarian.

..."best of our knowledge, as far as we know this had never been reported before, though I can't possible read all the published journals on earth, but by perform thorough search in google, the keywords did not match any documents"...

"what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger"---Goddess Casandra reminds me to be strong

"It's all just DNA. Do it."---phage434




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.