Inmost sun, on Jul 16 2010, 05:25 AM, said:
Setting ambitious aims in an irrealistic time schedule AND to be sure to reach the aims within this time table indicates a belief in miracles, doesn´t it?
Sounds like my former supervisor, although he categorically did not believe in luck. He did believe in massive parallelism.
In life we can't repeat the same event in a dozen different ways, and only stop to pick the reality where things worked out to produce a desired outcome.
But for some methods in science, parallelism is possible and thus "miracles" can happen.
In many ways there is an element of luck in the construction of a plasmid or BAC. Which colony on a plate amongst a hundred will contain a properly ligated plasmid, nobody knows. You would have to test them.
Now if the probability of a colony containing a structurally correct plasmid was 1/100 and you only tested 30 colonies, you would need a bit of "luck" to find this 1/100 colony. And imagine if you had to build 6 such plasmids in the space of a month or two, all requiring instances of such "luck" for their construction.. it would then become a miracle to complete the project on schedule.
But what would happen if you could easily and quickly test 100 or better yet 300 colonies (for instance with the help of a multichannel pipette/PCR or a robot). Now, what once a lucky event becomes a certainty. And a miracle is reduced to an everyday chore.
This probably isn't quite what you had in mind. But I guess I am try to say is with some ingenuity, perhaps a change in methods, it is sometimes possible to incorporate parallelism into an experiment design. This allows the isolation of a desired outcome even if the probability of a successful event is rare,
May your PCR products be long, your protocols short and your boss on holiday