Does anyone know whether NOD mouse strain is less susceptible to S.aureus infection than C57BL/6 or BALB/c?
S. aureus susceptibility of different mouse trains
Started by zodiac1505, Jul 02 2010 04:26 AM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 02 July 2010 - 04:26 AM
#2
Posted 04 July 2010 - 06:45 PM
This paper seems to compare c57 mice to NOD mice using one infection model:
http://diabetes.diab...54/10/2904.full
This paper compares various genetic backgrounds using another infection model:
http://jmm.sgmjourna...rint/48/11/1005
As does this one:
http://www3.intersci...001267/PDFSTART
http://diabetes.diab...54/10/2904.full
This paper compares various genetic backgrounds using another infection model:
http://jmm.sgmjourna...rint/48/11/1005
As does this one:
http://www3.intersci...001267/PDFSTART
#3
Posted 05 July 2010 - 06:58 AM
doxorubicin, on Jul 5 2010, 04:45 AM, said:
This paper seems to compare c57 mice to NOD mice using one infection model:
http://diabetes.diab...54/10/2904.full
This paper compares various genetic backgrounds using another infection model:
http://jmm.sgmjourna...rint/48/11/1005
As does this one:
http://www3.intersci...001267/PDFSTART
http://diabetes.diab...54/10/2904.full
This paper compares various genetic backgrounds using another infection model:
http://jmm.sgmjourna...rint/48/11/1005
As does this one:
http://www3.intersci...001267/PDFSTART
I found the first paper 3 days back and already read it. I think that's the most relevant to my question. We failed to observe an effect reported in the B6 mice in our NOD mice. I just wanted to know whether the reason may be that NOD mice have less susceptibility. But from the first paper I get the idea that they are as susceptible though it is not the same infection model nor the same S. aureus strain
#4
Posted 06 July 2010 - 09:32 AM
zodiac1505, on Jul 5 2010, 04:58 PM, said:
doxorubicin, on Jul 5 2010, 04:45 AM, said:
This paper seems to compare c57 mice to NOD mice using one infection model:
http://diabetes.diab...54/10/2904.full
This paper compares various genetic backgrounds using another infection model:
http://jmm.sgmjourna...rint/48/11/1005
As does this one:
http://www3.intersci...001267/PDFSTART
http://diabetes.diab...54/10/2904.full
This paper compares various genetic backgrounds using another infection model:
http://jmm.sgmjourna...rint/48/11/1005
As does this one:
http://www3.intersci...001267/PDFSTART
I found the first paper 3 days back and already read it. I think that's the most relevant to my question. We failed to observe an effect reported in the B6 mice in our NOD mice. I just wanted to know whether the reason may be that NOD mice have less susceptibility. But from the first paper I get the idea that they are as susceptible though it is not the same infection model nor the same S. aureus strain
Maybe you can contact the autors
If you don't know it, then ask it! Better to ask and look foolish to some then not ask and stay stupid.














