Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

- - - - -

wet or semi-dry transfer for low MW proteins


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 In_search_of_truth

In_search_of_truth

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 18 June 2010 - 07:26 AM

Hi folks,

Which protein transfer method is better for low MW proteins (8KDa in this case)? I have heard wet transfer is better because it ensures complete transfer but I've only been getting faint protein bands with wet. I do the transfer at 100V for 1 hour using the bio-rad wet transfer tank.

Many thanks in advance.

#2 Inmost sun

Inmost sun

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 286 posts
59
Excellent

Posted 18 June 2010 - 09:57 AM

View PostIn_search_of_truth, on Jun 18 2010, 04:26 PM, said:

Hi folks,

Which protein transfer method is better for low MW proteins (8KDa in this case)? I have heard wet transfer is better because it ensures complete transfer but I've only been getting faint protein bands with wet. I do the transfer at 100V for 1 hour using the bio-rad wet transfer tank.

Many thanks in advance.

semi-dry blotting will do

#3 K.B.

K.B.

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 174 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 18 June 2010 - 09:58 AM

I've heard the opposite - that wet WB is better for high MW proteins and semi-dry is better for low MW proteins, can't find the source though...

I've used semi-dry with Towbin buffer (Tris-Gly) or Dunn buffer (carbonate), 0.22um Immobilon Psq membrane, 0.8mA/cm2 for 1 hour and got quite nice results for 6-8 kDa proteins.

#4 In_search_of_truth

In_search_of_truth

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 18 June 2010 - 01:10 PM

View PostK.B., on Jun 18 2010, 10:58 AM, said:

I've heard the opposite - that wet WB is better for high MW proteins and semi-dry is better for low MW proteins, can't find the source though...

I've used semi-dry with Towbin buffer (Tris-Gly) or Dunn buffer (carbonate), 0.22um Immobilon Psq membrane, 0.8mA/cm2 for 1 hour and got quite nice results for 6-8 kDa proteins.


Hi K.B, thanks very much for your help. I'm new to the world of protein gels!

Ok I'll try the semi-dry. But please can you tell me what constant current you run yours at (say for a single mini gel if that changes anything)? I use the 0.2um nitrocellulose membrane and we have got the 'standard' bio-rad semi dry transfer set up. Also if you don't mind can you check if the recipe below is ok for the semi-dry transfer buffer,

Tris  2.91g
Glycine 1.465g
SDS 1.875ml
100ml of Meoh
---->>> made up to 500ml with dH20

#5 K.B.

K.B.

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 174 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 14 July 2010 - 01:08 AM

In_search_of_truth, I'm sorry for the delay but I was quite busy with other stuff...

I use current 0.8mA per square centimetre of membrane surface - you need to calculate correct value for size of your membrane eg. 10cm x 10cm = 100 cm2 x 0.8 mA = 80 mA = 0,08 A

As for transfer buffers - I use:
Towbin buffer: 0.192 M Gly + 25 mM Tris + 20% MeOH
Dunn carbonate buffer: 10 mM NaHCO3 + 3 mM Na2CO3 + 20% MeOH

I'm not an expert but I think you should skip SDS in your transfer buffer when working with low MW proteins.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.